2009•Xiandai faxueRequires access

Interaction of Sentencing and Conviction:Charges Changed for Fair Sentencing

Gao Yan-dong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The relationship between conviction and sentencing has been incorrectly determined and all the followings seem to have become maxims of criminal law:exact conviction is deemed supremacy in criminal law theory;the judiciary spends much on accurate decision of crimes;sentencing is decided by conviction,and sentencing can never affect conviction.However,conviction in the sense of finding out of what offense the accused is guilty is by no means the real purpose of criminal law.What is of greatest significance to the accused and society is sentencing and the sole aim of conviction is to impose punishment fairly.Therefore,whether a regular conviction leads to unfair sentencing,the charges against the accused may be changed for the purpose of fair sentencing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The relationship between conviction and sentencing has been incorrectly determined and all the followings seem to have become maxims of criminal law:exact conviction is deemed supremacy in criminal law theory;the judiciary spends much on accurate decision of crimes;sentencing is decided by conviction,and sentencing can never affect conviction.However,conviction in the sense of finding out of what offense the accused is guilty is by no means the real purpose of criminal law.What is of greatest significance to the accused and society is sentencing and the sole aim of conviction is to impose punishment fairly.Therefore,whether a regular conviction leads to unfair sentencing,the charges against the accused may be changed for the purpose of fair sentencing.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The relationship between conviction and sentencing has been incorrectly determined and all the followings seem to have become maxims of criminal law:exact conviction is deemed supremacy in criminal law theory;the judiciary spends much on accurate decision of crimes;sentencing is decided by conviction,and sentencing can never affect conviction.However,conviction in the sense of finding out of what offense the accused is guilty is by no means the real purpose of criminal law.What is of greatest significance to the accused and society is sentencing and the sole aim of conviction is to impose punishment fairly.Therefore,whether a regular conviction leads to unfair sentencing,the charges against the accused may be changed for the purpose of fair sentencing.

Key concepts: Conviction, Punishment (psychology), Law, Criminal law, Criminal Conviction, Criminology, Political science, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interaction of Sentencing and Conviction:Charges Changed for Fair Sentencing — Research Paper | ScholarLens