2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Reasonable Definition on the Objectivity Of Litigation Evidence

Tao Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The paper briefly reviews the argumentation history of the objectivity of litigation evidence, and then illustrates several propositions on it, and finally from the stand of historical reasonableness expounds the nature of the objectivity of litigation evidence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper briefly reviews the argumentation history of the objectivity of litigation evidence, and then illustrates several propositions on it, and finally from the stand of historical reasonableness expounds the nature of the objectivity of litigation evidence.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper briefly reviews the argumentation history of the objectivity of litigation evidence, and then illustrates several propositions on it, and finally from the stand of historical reasonableness expounds the nature of the objectivity of litigation evidence.

Key concepts: Objectivity (philosophy), Argumentation theory, Epistemology, Law, Philosophy, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reasonable Definition on the Objectivity Of Litigation Evidence — Research Paper | ScholarLens