2008Modern Digestion & InterventionRequires access

Evaluation of Fuji Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia

Yunxiang Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the value of Fuji Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy (FICE) for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Methods Five hundred and fifty-one patients were examined with ordinary colonoscopy from Aug. 2007 to Mar. 2008. One hundred and ninety-seven patients with colonic neoplasia or polypoid lesions were enrolled in this study. The patients were examined with magnifying conventional colonoscopy, magnifying FICE technique and magnifying chromoendoscopy technique, the pit pattern and blood capillary form of the lesion were examined. The endoscopic diagnosis was made, and compared with pathological diagnosis. Results Three hundred and ninety-eight neoplasms were detected in 197 patients, among those 90.8%(361/398) were detected with magnifying endoscopy, 98.7%(393/398) were detected with FICE technique, there was significant difference between the two methods. The coincident rate of FICE for the diagnosis of tumor and non-tumor lesions was 90.2%(359/398), which was significant higher than that of chromoendoscopy 82.4%(328/398)(P = 0.001). Conclusions Magnifying FICE could show mucosal microstructure and blood capillary form. It had higher power in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions compared with magnifying colonoscopy and magnifying chromoendoscopy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the value of Fuji Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy (FICE) for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Methods Five hundred and fifty-one patients were examined with ordinary colonoscopy from Aug. 2007 to Mar. 2008. One hundred and ninety-seven patients with colonic neoplasia or polypoid lesions were enrolled in this study. The patients were examined with magnifying conventional colonoscopy, magnifying FICE technique and magnifying chromoendoscopy technique, the pit pattern and blood capillary form of the lesion were examined. The endoscopic diagnosis was made, and compared with pathological diagnosis. Results Three hundred and ninety-eight neoplasms were detected in 197 patients, among those 90.8%(361/398) were detected with magnifying endoscopy, 98.7%(393/398) were detected with FICE technique, there was significant difference between the two methods. The coincident rate of FICE for the diagnosis of tumor and non-tumor lesions was 90.2%(359/398), which was significant higher than that of chromoendoscopy 82.4%(328/398)(P = 0.001). Conclusions Magnifying FICE could show mucosal microstructure and blood capillary form. It had higher power in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions compared with magnifying colonoscopy and magnifying chromoendoscopy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the value of Fuji Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy (FICE) for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Methods Five hundred and fifty-one patients were examined with ordinary colonoscopy from Aug. 2007 to Mar. 2008. One hundred and ninety-seven patients with colonic neoplasia or polypoid lesions were enrolled in this study. The patients were examined with magnifying conventional colonoscopy, magnifying FICE technique and magnifying chromoendoscopy technique, the pit pattern and blood capillary form of the lesion were examined. The endoscopic diagnosis was made, and compared with pathological diagnosis. Results Three hundred and ninety-eight neoplasms were detected in 197 patients, among those 90.8%(361/398) were detected with magnifying endoscopy, 98.7%(393/398) were detected with FICE technique, there was significant difference between the two methods. The coincident rate of FICE for the diagnosis of tumor and non-tumor lesions was 90.2%(359/398), which was significant higher than that of chromoendoscopy 82.4%(328/398)(P = 0.001). Conclusions Magnifying FICE could show mucosal microstructure and blood capillary form. It had higher power in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions compared with magnifying colonoscopy and magnifying chromoendoscopy.

Key concepts: Chromoendoscopy, Colonoscopy, Medicine, Endoscopy, Pathological, Lesion, Gastroenterology, Blood capillary

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Fuji Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia — Research Paper | ScholarLens