2015Administrative law reviewRequires access

On the Presidential Legislative Veto of the United States and its Inspiration for China

YU Zhao-b

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Presidential legislative veto of the United States could be divided into 6 categories. President has an authority to veto the whole bill and once vetoed only parts of the Bill, and the latter was boycotted by the Congress. President's line-item veto power is unconstitutional in Clinton v. City of New York(1998) and this induced Presidential Signing Statement from then on. Legislative veto power of the president of the United States is different from that of Britain Parliament and pocket veto is different from pocket crimes of China. The reasons of presidential veto power include ideas of separation of powers and checks, worrying about being changed from designing point while system running and providing bases for the presidential execution of laws, etc. China should boost multiple considerations of bills, should not confirm only parts of bills and should not change bills directly when upper legislature signs bills from under legislatures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Presidential legislative veto of the United States could be divided into 6 categories. President has an authority to veto the whole bill and once vetoed only parts of the Bill, and the latter was boycotted by the Congress. President's line-item veto power is unconstitutional in Clinton v. City of New York(1998) and this induced Presidential Signing Statement from then on. Legislative veto power of the president of the United States is different from that of Britain Parliament and pocket veto is different from pocket crimes of China. The reasons of presidential veto power include ideas of separation of powers and checks, worrying about being changed from designing point while system running and providing bases for the presidential execution of laws, etc. China should boost multiple considerations of bills, should not confirm only parts of bills and should not change bills directly when upper legislature signs bills from under legislatures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Presidential legislative veto of the United States could be divided into 6 categories. President has an authority to veto the whole bill and once vetoed only parts of the Bill, and the latter was boycotted by the Congress. President's line-item veto power is unconstitutional in Clinton v. City of New York(1998) and this induced Presidential Signing Statement from then on. Legislative veto power of the president of the United States is different from that of Britain Parliament and pocket veto is different from pocket crimes of China. The reasons of presidential veto power include ideas of separation of powers and checks, worrying about being changed from designing point while system running and providing bases for the presidential execution of laws, etc. China should boost multiple considerations of bills, should not confirm only parts of bills and should not change bills directly when upper legislature signs bills from under legislatures.

Key concepts: Veto, Presidential system, Legislature, Parliament, China, Political science, Law, Power (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Presidential Legislative Veto of the United States and its Inspiration for China — Research Paper | ScholarLens