2005•Sport Science and TechnologyRequires access

Comparative Research on Winning and Losing Points of Chinese Woman Volleyball Team in 28 th Olympic Games

Xia Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Through making classified statistics on winning and losing points of Chinese woman volleyball team at 8 matches in 2004 Olympic Games,this paper discussed the advantage and difference with other teams in areas such as attack,block and service with the method of mathematical analysis,comparative research.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Through making classified statistics on winning and losing points of Chinese woman volleyball team at 8 matches in 2004 Olympic Games,this paper discussed the advantage and difference with other teams in areas such as attack,block and service with the method of mathematical analysis,comparative research.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Through making classified statistics on winning and losing points of Chinese woman volleyball team at 8 matches in 2004 Olympic Games,this paper discussed the advantage and difference with other teams in areas such as attack,block and service with the method of mathematical analysis,comparative research.

Key concepts: Mathematical statistics, Advertising, Service (business), Asian games, Block (permutation group theory), Psychology, Applied psychology, Operations research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Research on Winning and Losing Points of Chinese Woman Volleyball Team in 28 th Olympic Games — Research Paper | ScholarLens