The Philosophical Level of Debate of Distributive Justice
LI Wen-fen
Abstract
LI Wen-fen
Abstract
The discussion on distributive justice in China's academic circles has swung to the explanatory model which emphasis on policy; research angle has shifted from the theoretical perspective to the reflection of the philosophy. These problems includes the difficulties in determining the standard of distributive justice, the disagreement on subjectivity and objectivity of distributive justice, the argument on internal relations between distributive justice and market system, limitations on the research methods, and so on. The existence of these problems shows that study of distributive justice in-depth is still a challenging task for the academic circles.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The discussion on distributive justice in China's academic circles has swung to the explanatory model which emphasis on policy; research angle has shifted from the theoretical perspective to the reflection of the philosophy. These problems includes the difficulties in determining the standard of distributive justice, the disagreement on subjectivity and objectivity of distributive justice, the argument on internal relations between distributive justice and market system, limitations on the research methods, and so on. The existence of these problems shows that study of distributive justice in-depth is still a challenging task for the academic circles.
Key concepts: Distributive justice, Distributive property, Objectivity (philosophy), Economic Justice, Argument (complex analysis), Epistemology, Subjectivity, Positive economics