2003Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-skull Base SurgeryRequires access

Quantitative evaluation of the upper airway resilience in adults

Hongjin Shi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the possibility of quantitative evaluation of upper airway resilience by fibre endoscope with Muller maneuver, and to study the resilience difference at all levels of the pharyngeal wall. Methods Thirty normal male adults were included in the study. The fibre endoscopic photos were taken on palate and lingua region at different negative pressures during Muller maneuver. The cross section area, the arrowy and coronal dimension of palate and lingua region upper airway were studied, and the total pharyngeal wall resilience (TPWR), lateral pharyngeal wall resilience (LPWR) and anteroposterior pharyngeal wall resilience (APWR) at different levels of the upper airway were calculated. Results There was obvious PWR difference between the palate and lingua region upper airway. The TPWR, LPWR and APWR of the palate region upper airway were much more than those of the lingua region upper airway. There was significant PWR difference among different upper airway negative pressure levels. The LPWR was much more than APWR in the palate and lingua region upper airway. Conclusion Quantitative data of pharynx wall resilience can be obtained by fibre endoscope with Muller maneuver assisted by computers. And there are obvious TPWR, LPWR and APWR differences at different sites of the upper airway and different upper airway negative pressure levels. The evaluation of pharyngeal wall resilience should be done in standardized maneuver.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the possibility of quantitative evaluation of upper airway resilience by fibre endoscope with Muller maneuver, and to study the resilience difference at all levels of the pharyngeal wall. Methods Thirty normal male adults were included in the study. The fibre endoscopic photos were taken on palate and lingua region at different negative pressures during Muller maneuver. The cross section area, the arrowy and coronal dimension of palate and lingua region upper airway were studied, and the total pharyngeal wall resilience (TPWR), lateral pharyngeal wall resilience (LPWR) and anteroposterior pharyngeal wall resilience (APWR) at different levels of the upper airway were calculated. Results There was obvious PWR difference between the palate and lingua region upper airway. The TPWR, LPWR and APWR of the palate region upper airway were much more than those of the lingua region upper airway. There was significant PWR difference among different upper airway negative pressure levels. The LPWR was much more than APWR in the palate and lingua region upper airway. Conclusion Quantitative data of pharynx wall resilience can be obtained by fibre endoscope with Muller maneuver assisted by computers. And there are obvious TPWR, LPWR and APWR differences at different sites of the upper airway and different upper airway negative pressure levels. The evaluation of pharyngeal wall resilience should be done in standardized maneuver.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the possibility of quantitative evaluation of upper airway resilience by fibre endoscope with Muller maneuver, and to study the resilience difference at all levels of the pharyngeal wall. Methods Thirty normal male adults were included in the study. The fibre endoscopic photos were taken on palate and lingua region at different negative pressures during Muller maneuver. The cross section area, the arrowy and coronal dimension of palate and lingua region upper airway were studied, and the total pharyngeal wall resilience (TPWR), lateral pharyngeal wall resilience (LPWR) and anteroposterior pharyngeal wall resilience (APWR) at different levels of the upper airway were calculated. Results There was obvious PWR difference between the palate and lingua region upper airway. The TPWR, LPWR and APWR of the palate region upper airway were much more than those of the lingua region upper airway. There was significant PWR difference among different upper airway negative pressure levels. The LPWR was much more than APWR in the palate and lingua region upper airway. Conclusion Quantitative data of pharynx wall resilience can be obtained by fibre endoscope with Muller maneuver assisted by computers. And there are obvious TPWR, LPWR and APWR differences at different sites of the upper airway and different upper airway negative pressure levels. The evaluation of pharyngeal wall resilience should be done in standardized maneuver.

Key concepts: Airway, Pharynx, Resilience (materials science), Soft palate, Medicine, Coronal plane, Anatomy, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quantitative evaluation of the upper airway resilience in adults — Research Paper | ScholarLens