2004Journal of Clinical CardiologyRequires access

Electrophysiological characterization in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with non-jumping atrioventricular nodal functional curves

Zhao Xiaoyan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To suggest the electrophysiological characterization in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with non-jumping atrioventricular nodal functional curves(AVNFC). Method: Seventy-five patients with AVNRT were divided into 3 groups.Group A(n=16):patients with no-jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing and A 1A 2 extrastimu1ations.Group B(n=10):patients with jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing.Group C(n=49):patients with jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing and A 1A 2 extrastimu1ations. Electrophysiological parameters were compared between the groups before and after ablation. Result: The A 1H 1max were shortened obviously in the three groups after ablation (P 0.05) .In Group A, the A 1H 1max before ablation and extent of shortening in A 1H 1max after ablation were shorter than those in Group B and Group C(P 0.05). The inducing rate of untypical AVNRT in Group A was higher than those in Group B and Group C. Conclusion:The shortening of A 1H 1max can be determined as an indicator for the endpoint of radiofrequency ablation in AVNRT patients with non-jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing and A 1A 2 extrastimu1ations.The untypical AVNRT correlate with no-jumping AVNFC.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To suggest the electrophysiological characterization in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with non-jumping atrioventricular nodal functional curves(AVNFC). Method: Seventy-five patients with AVNRT were divided into 3 groups.Group A(n=16):patients with no-jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing and A 1A 2 extrastimu1ations.Group B(n=10):patients with jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing.Group C(n=49):patients with jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing and A 1A 2 extrastimu1ations. Electrophysiological parameters were compared between the groups before and after ablation. Result: The A 1H 1max were shortened obviously in the three groups after ablation (P 0.05) .In Group A, the A 1H 1max before ablation and extent of shortening in A 1H 1max after ablation were shorter than those in Group B and Group C(P 0.05). The inducing rate of untypical AVNRT in Group A was higher than those in Group B and Group C. Conclusion:The shortening of A 1H 1max can be determined as an indicator for the endpoint of radiofrequency ablation in AVNRT patients with non-jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing and A 1A 2 extrastimu1ations.The untypical AVNRT correlate with no-jumping AVNFC.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To suggest the electrophysiological characterization in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with non-jumping atrioventricular nodal functional curves(AVNFC). Method: Seventy-five patients with AVNRT were divided into 3 groups.Group A(n=16):patients with no-jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing and A 1A 2 extrastimu1ations.Group B(n=10):patients with jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing.Group C(n=49):patients with jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing and A 1A 2 extrastimu1ations. Electrophysiological parameters were compared between the groups before and after ablation. Result: The A 1H 1max were shortened obviously in the three groups after ablation (P 0.05) .In Group A, the A 1H 1max before ablation and extent of shortening in A 1H 1max after ablation were shorter than those in Group B and Group C(P 0.05). The inducing rate of untypical AVNRT in Group A was higher than those in Group B and Group C. Conclusion:The shortening of A 1H 1max can be determined as an indicator for the endpoint of radiofrequency ablation in AVNRT patients with non-jumping AVNFC during atrial incremental pacing and A 1A 2 extrastimu1ations.The untypical AVNRT correlate with no-jumping AVNFC.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ablation, NODAL, Jumping, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Tachycardia, Electrophysiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electrophysiological characterization in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with non-jumping atrioventricular nodal functional curves — Research Paper | ScholarLens