2015Dalian Yike Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Analysis of therapeutic effects of 284 patients with ulcerative colitis

Linglin Tian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of different medication and routes of administration on ulcerative colitis( UC) patients. Methods 284 UC patients,who were admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from 1. 1. 2010 to 1. 1. 2015,were included in this study. According to different regimens,patients with mild-to-moderate severity or moderate-to-severe severity were divided into 6 groups: Sulfasalazine( SASP) group,Mesalazine group,oral Mesalazine + Mesalazine enema / suppository group,oral Mesalazine +Glucosteroids( GCS) enema group,intravenous GCS group and Infliximab( IFX) group. Administration methods can be summarized as systemic application( oral / intravenous dosage) and topical usage( enema / suppository). Comparison of therapeutic effects between different medication and routes of administration were conducted. Overall response rate( ORR) =remission rate + effective rate. Results( 1) For mild-to-moderate cases,Mesalazine was better than SASP( 92. 06%,vs. 68. 18%,P 0. 01); oral Mesalazine + Mesalazine enema / suppository was the best regimen( 95. 16%),followed by oral Mesalazine( 92. 06%); while oral Mesalazine + GSC enema was found least effective( 90. 63%),P 0. 05.( 2) For moderate-to-severe cases,IFX was better than GCS( 100% vs. 90. 63%,P 0. 05).( 3) Patients with refractory ulcerative colitis( RUC) can be rescued with longer duration of GCS,transition to immunosuppressants / biologicals and surgery.( 4) Safety: Incidence of adverse events( AEs) for SASP,Mesalazine and IFX was 27. 27%,2. 13% and 6. 67%,respectively. Conclusion( 1) For mild-to-moderate cases,oral Mesalazine + Mesalazine enema / suppository is the best regimen.( 2) IFX is better than GCS for moderate-to-severe cases.( 3) RUC patients can be managed with longer duration of GCS,transition to immunosuppressants / biologicals and surgery.( 4) Drug therapy is relatively safe,and has low incidence of AEs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of different medication and routes of administration on ulcerative colitis( UC) patients. Methods 284 UC patients,who were admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from 1. 1. 2010 to 1. 1. 2015,were included in this study. According to different regimens,patients with mild-to-moderate severity or moderate-to-severe severity were divided into 6 groups: Sulfasalazine( SASP) group,Mesalazine group,oral Mesalazine + Mesalazine enema / suppository group,oral Mesalazine +Glucosteroids( GCS) enema group,intravenous GCS group and Infliximab( IFX) group. Administration methods can be summarized as systemic application( oral / intravenous dosage) and topical usage( enema / suppository). Comparison of therapeutic effects between different medication and routes of administration were conducted. Overall response rate( ORR) =remission rate + effective rate. Results( 1) For mild-to-moderate cases,Mesalazine was better than SASP( 92. 06%,vs. 68. 18%,P 0. 01); oral Mesalazine + Mesalazine enema / suppository was the best regimen( 95. 16%),followed by oral Mesalazine( 92. 06%); while oral Mesalazine + GSC enema was found least effective( 90. 63%),P 0. 05.( 2) For moderate-to-severe cases,IFX was better than GCS( 100% vs. 90. 63%,P 0. 05).( 3) Patients with refractory ulcerative colitis( RUC) can be rescued with longer duration of GCS,transition to immunosuppressants / biologicals and surgery.( 4) Safety: Incidence of adverse events( AEs) for SASP,Mesalazine and IFX was 27. 27%,2. 13% and 6. 67%,respectively. Conclusion( 1) For mild-to-moderate cases,oral Mesalazine + Mesalazine enema / suppository is the best regimen.( 2) IFX is better than GCS for moderate-to-severe cases.( 3) RUC patients can be managed with longer duration of GCS,transition to immunosuppressants / biologicals and surgery.( 4) Drug therapy is relatively safe,and has low incidence of AEs.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of different medication and routes of administration on ulcerative colitis( UC) patients. Methods 284 UC patients,who were admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from 1. 1. 2010 to 1. 1. 2015,were included in this study. According to different regimens,patients with mild-to-moderate severity or moderate-to-severe severity were divided into 6 groups: Sulfasalazine( SASP) group,Mesalazine group,oral Mesalazine + Mesalazine enema / suppository group,oral Mesalazine +Glucosteroids( GCS) enema group,intravenous GCS group and Infliximab( IFX) group. Administration methods can be summarized as systemic application( oral / intravenous dosage) and topical usage( enema / suppository). Comparison of therapeutic effects between different medication and routes of administration were conducted. Overall response rate( ORR) =remission rate + effective rate. Results( 1) For mild-to-moderate cases,Mesalazine was better than SASP( 92. 06%,vs. 68. 18%,P 0. 01); oral Mesalazine + Mesalazine enema / suppository was the best regimen( 95. 16%),followed by oral Mesalazine( 92. 06%); while oral Mesalazine + GSC enema was found least effective( 90. 63%),P 0. 05.( 2) For moderate-to-severe cases,IFX was better than GCS( 100% vs. 90. 63%,P 0. 05).( 3) Patients with refractory ulcerative colitis( RUC) can be rescued with longer duration of GCS,transition to immunosuppressants / biologicals and surgery.( 4) Safety: Incidence of adverse events( AEs) for SASP,Mesalazine and IFX was 27. 27%,2. 13% and 6. 67%,respectively. Conclusion( 1) For mild-to-moderate cases,oral Mesalazine + Mesalazine enema / suppository is the best regimen.( 2) IFX is better than GCS for moderate-to-severe cases.( 3) RUC patients can be managed with longer duration of GCS,transition to immunosuppressants / biologicals and surgery.( 4) Drug therapy is relatively safe,and has low incidence of AEs.

Key concepts: Mesalazine, Medicine, Enema, Suppository, Ulcerative colitis, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Sulfasalazine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of therapeutic effects of 284 patients with ulcerative colitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens