2000Unpublished venueRequires access

Studies on acute toxicity and efficacy of sarafloxacin against experimental salmonellosis in chicks

Jiang Zhong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The acute LD 50 of sarafloxacin hydrochloride in mice was above 5 000 mg/kg by oral administration and 677.6 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection.Results of the drug sensitivity test showed that inhibition zone of sarafloxacin hydrochloride was (23.3±0.96)mm against salmonella.The therapeutic trials of sarafloxacin hydrochloride (20,35,50,75 mg/L) and norfloxacin (150 mg/kg) were carried out in chicks by oral administration in drinking water for 5 successive days against experimental induced salmonellosis.The protective rates of the above drugs were 90.0%,86.7%,90.0%,100.0% and 83.7%,respectively,whereas the livability of salmonellosis infected but untreated group was 56.7% ( P 0.01).The relative weight gain rates of the sarafloxacin hydrochloride treated groups in 9 days after salmonellosis inoculation were 74.8%,69.3%,74.1% and 79.8%,respectively,all significantly ( P 0.05) higher than that of the positive control (53.4%),and also a little higher than that of norfloxacin treated group (61.5%).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The acute LD 50 of sarafloxacin hydrochloride in mice was above 5 000 mg/kg by oral administration and 677.6 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection.Results of the drug sensitivity test showed that inhibition zone of sarafloxacin hydrochloride was (23.3±0.96)mm against salmonella.The therapeutic trials of sarafloxacin hydrochloride (20,35,50,75 mg/L) and norfloxacin (150 mg/kg) were carried out in chicks by oral administration in drinking water for 5 successive days against experimental induced salmonellosis.The protective rates of the above drugs were 90.0%,86.7%,90.0%,100.0% and 83.7%,respectively,whereas the livability of salmonellosis infected but untreated group was 56.7% ( P 0.01).The relative weight gain rates of the sarafloxacin hydrochloride treated groups in 9 days after salmonellosis inoculation were 74.8%,69.3%,74.1% and 79.8%,respectively,all significantly ( P 0.05) higher than that of the positive control (53.4%),and also a little higher than that of norfloxacin treated group (61.5%).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The acute LD 50 of sarafloxacin hydrochloride in mice was above 5 000 mg/kg by oral administration and 677.6 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection.Results of the drug sensitivity test showed that inhibition zone of sarafloxacin hydrochloride was (23.3±0.96)mm against salmonella.The therapeutic trials of sarafloxacin hydrochloride (20,35,50,75 mg/L) and norfloxacin (150 mg/kg) were carried out in chicks by oral administration in drinking water for 5 successive days against experimental induced salmonellosis.The protective rates of the above drugs were 90.0%,86.7%,90.0%,100.0% and 83.7%,respectively,whereas the livability of salmonellosis infected but untreated group was 56.7% ( P 0.01).The relative weight gain rates of the sarafloxacin hydrochloride treated groups in 9 days after salmonellosis inoculation were 74.8%,69.3%,74.1% and 79.8%,respectively,all significantly ( P 0.05) higher than that of the positive control (53.4%),and also a little higher than that of norfloxacin treated group (61.5%).

Key concepts: Norfloxacin, Medicine, Oral administration, Hydrochloride, Salmonella, Pharmacology, Antibacterial agent, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Studies on acute toxicity and efficacy of sarafloxacin against experimental salmonellosis in chicks — Research Paper | ScholarLens