2013Journal of Dental Prevention and TreatmentRequires access

Clinical effect of three filling methods in restoration of proximal-occlusal cavity in molars

Jiehui Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the restoration effect of silver amalgam filling,bonded amalgam restoration and tetric ceram filling for treatment of proximal-occlusal cavity in molars.Methods Four hundred and sixty-five malors from 350 cases were randomized into 3 groups,and treated with 3 kinds of restoration methods,which were silver amalgam filling,bonded amalgam restoration and tetric ceram filling.Results The periodical follow-up in the first year revealed no difference in the restoration effect of 3 groups,and the success rates were 98.00%,100.00%,100.00% respectively.There was significant difference among these groups after three years,and the success rates were 71.33%,85.71%,97.32% respectively.The tetric ceram filling group was better than bonded amalgam restoration group,and the bonded amalgam restoration group was better than silver amalgam filling group.Conclusion Tetric ceram filling shows the best restoration effect,more suitable than other two methods,and the bonded amalgam restoration is better than silver amalgam filling.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the restoration effect of silver amalgam filling,bonded amalgam restoration and tetric ceram filling for treatment of proximal-occlusal cavity in molars.Methods Four hundred and sixty-five malors from 350 cases were randomized into 3 groups,and treated with 3 kinds of restoration methods,which were silver amalgam filling,bonded amalgam restoration and tetric ceram filling.Results The periodical follow-up in the first year revealed no difference in the restoration effect of 3 groups,and the success rates were 98.00%,100.00%,100.00% respectively.There was significant difference among these groups after three years,and the success rates were 71.33%,85.71%,97.32% respectively.The tetric ceram filling group was better than bonded amalgam restoration group,and the bonded amalgam restoration group was better than silver amalgam filling group.Conclusion Tetric ceram filling shows the best restoration effect,more suitable than other two methods,and the bonded amalgam restoration is better than silver amalgam filling.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the restoration effect of silver amalgam filling,bonded amalgam restoration and tetric ceram filling for treatment of proximal-occlusal cavity in molars.Methods Four hundred and sixty-five malors from 350 cases were randomized into 3 groups,and treated with 3 kinds of restoration methods,which were silver amalgam filling,bonded amalgam restoration and tetric ceram filling.Results The periodical follow-up in the first year revealed no difference in the restoration effect of 3 groups,and the success rates were 98.00%,100.00%,100.00% respectively.There was significant difference among these groups after three years,and the success rates were 71.33%,85.71%,97.32% respectively.The tetric ceram filling group was better than bonded amalgam restoration group,and the bonded amalgam restoration group was better than silver amalgam filling group.Conclusion Tetric ceram filling shows the best restoration effect,more suitable than other two methods,and the bonded amalgam restoration is better than silver amalgam filling.

Key concepts: Amalgam (chemistry), Molar, Dentistry, Significant difference, Dental restoration, Materials science, Orthodontics, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical effect of three filling methods in restoration of proximal-occlusal cavity in molars — Research Paper | ScholarLens