2007•Clinical Education of General PracticeRequires access

Spinal anesthesia with low-concentration ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery

Zhang Weiqin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the feasibility of spinal anesthesia (SA) with low-concentration ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. Methods Forty-six patients were randomized to one of the two groups: group A (SA,n=23) and group B (continuous epidural anesthesia CEA,n=23). The patients in both groups were premedicated with luminal 100 mg. In group A , SA was performed at L2-3 or L3-4 interspace. 0.375% ropivacaine 2 ml was injected. In group B, epidural catheter was placed also at L2-3 or L3-4. A test dose of 3ml of 2% lidocaine was injected and then a mixture of 1.0% lidocaine and 0.25% ropivacaine. Degree of motor blockade were measured and recorded. The intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with spinal or epidural anesthesia were recorded. Results In group A, MAP was slightly decreased after initial dose of local anesthetics compared to the baseline MAP in both groups. The incidences of hypotension, which needed treatment with intravenous ephedrine, shivering during operation, and postoperative nausea and vomiting in group A were significantly lower than group B. Conclusions Compared with CEA, SA produced satisfactory sensory block with less hemodynamic changes and less complications. It is the choice for elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the feasibility of spinal anesthesia (SA) with low-concentration ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. Methods Forty-six patients were randomized to one of the two groups: group A (SA,n=23) and group B (continuous epidural anesthesia CEA,n=23). The patients in both groups were premedicated with luminal 100 mg. In group A , SA was performed at L2-3 or L3-4 interspace. 0.375% ropivacaine 2 ml was injected. In group B, epidural catheter was placed also at L2-3 or L3-4. A test dose of 3ml of 2% lidocaine was injected and then a mixture of 1.0% lidocaine and 0.25% ropivacaine. Degree of motor blockade were measured and recorded. The intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with spinal or epidural anesthesia were recorded. Results In group A, MAP was slightly decreased after initial dose of local anesthetics compared to the baseline MAP in both groups. The incidences of hypotension, which needed treatment with intravenous ephedrine, shivering during operation, and postoperative nausea and vomiting in group A were significantly lower than group B. Conclusions Compared with CEA, SA produced satisfactory sensory block with less hemodynamic changes and less complications. It is the choice for elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the feasibility of spinal anesthesia (SA) with low-concentration ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. Methods Forty-six patients were randomized to one of the two groups: group A (SA,n=23) and group B (continuous epidural anesthesia CEA,n=23). The patients in both groups were premedicated with luminal 100 mg. In group A , SA was performed at L2-3 or L3-4 interspace. 0.375% ropivacaine 2 ml was injected. In group B, epidural catheter was placed also at L2-3 or L3-4. A test dose of 3ml of 2% lidocaine was injected and then a mixture of 1.0% lidocaine and 0.25% ropivacaine. Degree of motor blockade were measured and recorded. The intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with spinal or epidural anesthesia were recorded. Results In group A, MAP was slightly decreased after initial dose of local anesthetics compared to the baseline MAP in both groups. The incidences of hypotension, which needed treatment with intravenous ephedrine, shivering during operation, and postoperative nausea and vomiting in group A were significantly lower than group B. Conclusions Compared with CEA, SA produced satisfactory sensory block with less hemodynamic changes and less complications. It is the choice for elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ropivacaine, Anesthesia, Lidocaine, Shivering, Vomiting, Nausea, Ephedrine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spinal anesthesia with low-concentration ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing lower extremity surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens