2010China Medical HeraldRequires access

Clinical observation of 152 myopic children wearing ordinary lens,progressive lens and non-focal glasses

Dongping Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To observe the influence of general concave lens,progressive addition lenses and no corrective lens on the refractive change of children and adolescents. Methods:152 cases of out-patients myopic children(304 eyes) from March 2007 to December 2008 whose myopia extend 0.50 to 2.0 DS,excluding other eye diseases except refractive errors,was treated with 0.5% tropicamide mydriatic to detect refractive optometry. Next day the cases were randomly divided into 3 groups:53 cases(106 eyes) who wear normal concave lens of 1.0 corrected visual acuity;51 cases(102 eyes) who wear progressive multifocal lenses of +1.5D addition;48 cases(96 eyes) who do not wear the correct lens. And reviewed the refractive optometry 6 months and 12 months after the referral. Results:3 times refraction results showed that there was no significant difference between groups(all P0.05) . Conclusion:The concave lens or progressive multifocal lens could not slow down the development of myopia in children and adolescents.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To observe the influence of general concave lens,progressive addition lenses and no corrective lens on the refractive change of children and adolescents. Methods:152 cases of out-patients myopic children(304 eyes) from March 2007 to December 2008 whose myopia extend 0.50 to 2.0 DS,excluding other eye diseases except refractive errors,was treated with 0.5% tropicamide mydriatic to detect refractive optometry. Next day the cases were randomly divided into 3 groups:53 cases(106 eyes) who wear normal concave lens of 1.0 corrected visual acuity;51 cases(102 eyes) who wear progressive multifocal lenses of +1.5D addition;48 cases(96 eyes) who do not wear the correct lens. And reviewed the refractive optometry 6 months and 12 months after the referral. Results:3 times refraction results showed that there was no significant difference between groups(all P0.05) . Conclusion:The concave lens or progressive multifocal lens could not slow down the development of myopia in children and adolescents.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To observe the influence of general concave lens,progressive addition lenses and no corrective lens on the refractive change of children and adolescents. Methods:152 cases of out-patients myopic children(304 eyes) from March 2007 to December 2008 whose myopia extend 0.50 to 2.0 DS,excluding other eye diseases except refractive errors,was treated with 0.5% tropicamide mydriatic to detect refractive optometry. Next day the cases were randomly divided into 3 groups:53 cases(106 eyes) who wear normal concave lens of 1.0 corrected visual acuity;51 cases(102 eyes) who wear progressive multifocal lenses of +1.5D addition;48 cases(96 eyes) who do not wear the correct lens. And reviewed the refractive optometry 6 months and 12 months after the referral. Results:3 times refraction results showed that there was no significant difference between groups(all P0.05) . Conclusion:The concave lens or progressive multifocal lens could not slow down the development of myopia in children and adolescents.

Key concepts: Medicine, Tropicamide, Lens (geology), Optometry, Ophthalmology, Refraction, Refractive error, Visual acuity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical observation of 152 myopic children wearing ordinary lens,progressive lens and non-focal glasses — Research Paper | ScholarLens