[The pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of acipimox sustained-release tablets after a single and multiple oral administration in healthy dogs].
Xinggang Yang, Shufang Nie, Hai-jiao Bai, Guo-jua Zhang, Wei-San Pan
Abstract
Xinggang Yang, Shufang Nie, Hai-jiao Bai, Guo-jua Zhang, Wei-San Pan
Abstract
AIM: To study the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of acipimox sustained-release tablets (SRT) after a single and multiple oral dose in healthy dogs. METHODS: The plasma concentrations of of SRT and reference capsules with a single and multiple oral doses. RESULTS: The drug concentration-time profiles fitted to a noncompartment model. After a single dose administration of sustained-release tablets and capsules, the pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: AUC were (158 +/- 30) and (147 +/- 37) microg x h x mL(-1); Tmax were (4.3 +/- 0.8) and (2.6 +/- 1.3) h; Cmax were (29 +/- 6) and (42 +/- 10) microg x mL(-1); T(1/2) were (2.3 +/- 0.7) and (1.60 +/- 0.10) h; MRT were (6.0 +/- 0.8) and (3.9 +/- 0.7) h, respectively. The relative bioavailability of the sustained-release tablet was (108 +/- 16) %. After a multiple oral administration of sustained-release tablets and capsules, the pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: AUC were (209 +/- 23) and (195 +/- 26) microg x h x mL(-1); Tmax were (6.3 +/- 0.8) and (3.4 +/- 1.5) h; Cmax were (27 +/- 4) and (36 +/- 5) microg x mL(-1); Cmmin were (2.2 +/- 1.0) and (0.20 +/- 0.20) microg x mL(-1); Cav were (8.7 +/- 1.0) and (8.1 +/- 1.1) micro x mL(-1); FI were (293 +/- 73) % and (448 +/- 91) % , respectively. The relative bioavailability of the sustained-release tablet was (114 +/- 19) %. CONCLUSION: The results of two one-side test from single dose administration shown that two preparations were bioequivalent. The Cmax of sustained-release tablet was lower than that of capsules, while the Tmax and MRT of sustained-release tablet were higher than that of capsule, which indicating a good retarding effect. The results from multiple dose administration also shown that two preparations were bioequivalent and the DF of sustained-release tablet was significant lower than that of capsule.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM: To study the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of acipimox sustained-release tablets (SRT) after a single and multiple oral dose in healthy dogs. METHODS: The plasma concentrations of of SRT and reference capsules with a single and multiple oral doses. RESULTS: The drug concentration-time profiles fitted to a noncompartment model. After a single dose administration of sustained-release tablets and capsules, the pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: AUC were (158 +/- 30) and (147 +/- 37) microg x h x mL(-1); Tmax were (4.3 +/- 0.8) and (2.6 +/- 1.3) h; Cmax were (29 +/- 6) and (42 +/- 10) microg x mL(-1); T(1/2) were (2.3 +/- 0.7) and (1.60 +/- 0.10) h; MRT were (6.0 +/- 0.8) and (3.9 +/- 0.7) h, respectively. The relative bioavailability of the sustained-release tablet was (108 +/- 16) %. After a multiple oral administration of sustained-release tablets and capsules, the pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: AUC were (209 +/- 23) and (195 +/- 26) microg x h x mL(-1); Tmax were (6.3 +/- 0.8) and (3.4 +/- 1.5) h; Cmax were (27 +/- 4) and (36 +/- 5) microg x mL(-1); Cmmin were (2.2 +/- 1.0) and (0.20 +/- 0.20) microg x mL(-1); Cav were (8.7 +/- 1.0) and (8.1 +/- 1.1) micro x mL(-1); FI were (293 +/- 73) % and (448 +/- 91) % , respectively. The relative bioavailability of the sustained-release tablet was (114 +/- 19) %. CONCLUSION: The results of two one-side test from single dose administration shown that two preparations were bioequivalent. The Cmax of sustained-release tablet was lower than that of capsules, while the Tmax and MRT of sustained-release tablet were higher than that of capsule, which indicating a good retarding effect. The results from multiple dose administration also shown that two preparations were bioequivalent and the DF of sustained-release tablet was significant lower than that of capsule.
Key concepts: Pharmacokinetics, Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Cmax, Oral administration, Pharmacology, Medicine, Dosage form