2007•Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and TechnologyRequires access

Comparative Study on Steel Frame Models through Seismic Response Analysis

Zang Xiu-ping

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Two steel frames with different interlaminar stiffness are considered as the mass-system model.The peak value of the velocity and acceleration of the seismic wave are investigated separately.The time-history analysis is employed to calculate the seismic response of two models.Particular analysis are carried out by comparison.Results indicate that the evaluation method for the intensity of seismic waves by using the velocity peak value is more convincing than the acceleration peak value.And the damage extent of the floor will greatly connect with the relative interlaminar stiffness.For the structure with well-proportioned stiffness,the damage will mostly converge in the lower floor.For the structure with relative uneven stiffness,the outcome will be different.The Qiu Shanhong viewpoint of which the input energy depends only on the mass of the structure and the elementary cycle is verified.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two steel frames with different interlaminar stiffness are considered as the mass-system model.The peak value of the velocity and acceleration of the seismic wave are investigated separately.The time-history analysis is employed to calculate the seismic response of two models.Particular analysis are carried out by comparison.Results indicate that the evaluation method for the intensity of seismic waves by using the velocity peak value is more convincing than the acceleration peak value.And the damage extent of the floor will greatly connect with the relative interlaminar stiffness.For the structure with well-proportioned stiffness,the damage will mostly converge in the lower floor.For the structure with relative uneven stiffness,the outcome will be different.The Qiu Shanhong viewpoint of which the input energy depends only on the mass of the structure and the elementary cycle is verified.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two steel frames with different interlaminar stiffness are considered as the mass-system model.The peak value of the velocity and acceleration of the seismic wave are investigated separately.The time-history analysis is employed to calculate the seismic response of two models.Particular analysis are carried out by comparison.Results indicate that the evaluation method for the intensity of seismic waves by using the velocity peak value is more convincing than the acceleration peak value.And the damage extent of the floor will greatly connect with the relative interlaminar stiffness.For the structure with well-proportioned stiffness,the damage will mostly converge in the lower floor.For the structure with relative uneven stiffness,the outcome will be different.The Qiu Shanhong viewpoint of which the input energy depends only on the mass of the structure and the elementary cycle is verified.

Key concepts: Stiffness, Structural engineering, Acceleration, Frame (networking), Seismic analysis, Energy (signal processing), Geology, Intensity (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Study on Steel Frame Models through Seismic Response Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens