2001•Journal of Lanzhor UniversityRequires access

Criticism on Logical Positivism's Picture of Science and its Proposition

Haiming Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Logical positivism was a quite influential school in the west at the beginning of twentieth century. It advocated the verifiability criterion of meaning, according to which no statement is even meaningful unless either it is in principle possible to empirically verify it or else it is analytic. The positivism attempted to reduce all knowledge to scientific knowledge, all truths to empirical, scientific truths, and all methods of knowing to empirical, scientific methods. The positivism was based on its misreading of the picture of science that science was rigidly objective, rational and empirical. This article, trying to find ways to refute its idea, points out that it's illegitimate for the logical positivism to reduce all knowledge to sci- entific knowledge, all methods of knowing to purely empirical, scientific methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Logical positivism was a quite influential school in the west at the beginning of twentieth century. It advocated the verifiability criterion of meaning, according to which no statement is even meaningful unless either it is in principle possible to empirically verify it or else it is analytic. The positivism attempted to reduce all knowledge to scientific knowledge, all truths to empirical, scientific truths, and all methods of knowing to empirical, scientific methods. The positivism was based on its misreading of the picture of science that science was rigidly objective, rational and empirical. This article, trying to find ways to refute its idea, points out that it's illegitimate for the logical positivism to reduce all knowledge to sci- entific knowledge, all methods of knowing to purely empirical, scientific methods.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Logical positivism was a quite influential school in the west at the beginning of twentieth century. It advocated the verifiability criterion of meaning, according to which no statement is even meaningful unless either it is in principle possible to empirically verify it or else it is analytic. The positivism attempted to reduce all knowledge to scientific knowledge, all truths to empirical, scientific truths, and all methods of knowing to empirical, scientific methods. The positivism was based on its misreading of the picture of science that science was rigidly objective, rational and empirical. This article, trying to find ways to refute its idea, points out that it's illegitimate for the logical positivism to reduce all knowledge to sci- entific knowledge, all methods of knowing to purely empirical, scientific methods.

Key concepts: Positivism, Logical positivism, Proposition, Epistemology, Meaning (existential), Criticism, Statement (logic), Sociology of scientific knowledge

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Criticism on Logical Positivism's Picture of Science and its Proposition — Research Paper | ScholarLens