2002•PubMedRequires access

[Relationship between vaginal sialidase bacteria vaginosis and chorioammionitis].

Xin Zhang, Xingli Xu, Jinfeng Li, Nan Li, Tingfeng Yan, Xiuqing Ju

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship among vaginal sialidase, bacterial vaginosis (BV), chorioammionitis and subsequent adverse outcome of pregnancy. METHODS: Vaginal sialidase was measured by colorimetry in samples of vaginal discharges from 80 pregnant women with BV (study group) and 60 normal pregnant women at same gestation weeks (control group). Color turning blue means positive of sialidase activity, and no color changing means negative. The diagnosis of chorioammionitis was based on pathological examination. RESULTS: Ninety six dot three percent, 3.3% exhibited sialidase activities in study group and control group, respectively. There were significant differences between these two groups (P < 0.001). By measuring vaginal sialidase activity, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value in diagnosing BV were 96.3%, 96.7%, 97.5% and 95.1%, respectively. Chorioammionitis, premature rupture of membranes, premature delivery and puerperal infection in sialidase positive group were significantly higher than the negative group. Sensitivity, specialty of sialidase activity for chorioammionitis were 87.5%, 50.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Vaginal sialidase activity has strong relation with bacterial vaginosis. Measuring vaginal sialidase activity is a fast, easy, and useful method to diagnose bacterial vaginosis. It also has relation with chorioammionitis and subsequent adverse outcome of pregnancy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship among vaginal sialidase, bacterial vaginosis (BV), chorioammionitis and subsequent adverse outcome of pregnancy. METHODS: Vaginal sialidase was measured by colorimetry in samples of vaginal discharges from 80 pregnant women with BV (study group) and 60 normal pregnant women at same gestation weeks (control group). Color turning blue means positive of sialidase activity, and no color changing means negative. The diagnosis of chorioammionitis was based on pathological examination. RESULTS: Ninety six dot three percent, 3.3% exhibited sialidase activities in study group and control group, respectively. There were significant differences between these two groups (P < 0.001). By measuring vaginal sialidase activity, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value in diagnosing BV were 96.3%, 96.7%, 97.5% and 95.1%, respectively. Chorioammionitis, premature rupture of membranes, premature delivery and puerperal infection in sialidase positive group were significantly higher than the negative group. Sensitivity, specialty of sialidase activity for chorioammionitis were 87.5%, 50.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Vaginal sialidase activity has strong relation with bacterial vaginosis. Measuring vaginal sialidase activity is a fast, easy, and useful method to diagnose bacterial vaginosis. It also has relation with chorioammionitis and subsequent adverse outcome of pregnancy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship among vaginal sialidase, bacterial vaginosis (BV), chorioammionitis and subsequent adverse outcome of pregnancy. METHODS: Vaginal sialidase was measured by colorimetry in samples of vaginal discharges from 80 pregnant women with BV (study group) and 60 normal pregnant women at same gestation weeks (control group). Color turning blue means positive of sialidase activity, and no color changing means negative. The diagnosis of chorioammionitis was based on pathological examination. RESULTS: Ninety six dot three percent, 3.3% exhibited sialidase activities in study group and control group, respectively. There were significant differences between these two groups (P < 0.001). By measuring vaginal sialidase activity, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value in diagnosing BV were 96.3%, 96.7%, 97.5% and 95.1%, respectively. Chorioammionitis, premature rupture of membranes, premature delivery and puerperal infection in sialidase positive group were significantly higher than the negative group. Sensitivity, specialty of sialidase activity for chorioammionitis were 87.5%, 50.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Vaginal sialidase activity has strong relation with bacterial vaginosis. Measuring vaginal sialidase activity is a fast, easy, and useful method to diagnose bacterial vaginosis. It also has relation with chorioammionitis and subsequent adverse outcome of pregnancy.

Key concepts: Bacterial vaginosis, Sialidase, Vaginal disease, Vaginal smear, Vagina, Gestation, Obstetrics, Pregnancy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Relationship between vaginal sialidase bacteria vaginosis and chorioammionitis]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens