2004Academic Journal of Second Military Medical UniversityRequires access

Desflurane vs propofol anesthesia in influencing somatosensory evoked potential

Hu Bai

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the somatosensory-evoked potentials(SSEP) and the clinical recovery profiles of desflurane/nitrous oxide and propofol anesthesia during surgery to correct scoliosis.Methods:Twenty adolescent patients were randomized into 2 groups:desflurane/nitrous oxide anesthesia group(n=10) and propofol anesthesia group(n=10).An fentanil infusion was used for analgesia in both groups when needed.Results:Changes in anesthetic concentration of 2 drugs produced little effect on the latency of SSEP,but the effect on SSEP amplitude was significant(P0.05).Desflurane produced a faster decrease and recovery in SSEP than propofol did(P0.05).The recovery time for eye opening(mean 8.0 vs 20.1 min, P= 0.09) and toe movement(mean 7.7 vs 15.68 min,P=0.22) in 2 groups had no significant difference.Conclusion:Desflurane produces a faster decrease and a recovery of SSEP amplitude as well as a better conscious state than propofol does.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the somatosensory-evoked potentials(SSEP) and the clinical recovery profiles of desflurane/nitrous oxide and propofol anesthesia during surgery to correct scoliosis.Methods:Twenty adolescent patients were randomized into 2 groups:desflurane/nitrous oxide anesthesia group(n=10) and propofol anesthesia group(n=10).An fentanil infusion was used for analgesia in both groups when needed.Results:Changes in anesthetic concentration of 2 drugs produced little effect on the latency of SSEP,but the effect on SSEP amplitude was significant(P0.05).Desflurane produced a faster decrease and recovery in SSEP than propofol did(P0.05).The recovery time for eye opening(mean 8.0 vs 20.1 min, P= 0.09) and toe movement(mean 7.7 vs 15.68 min,P=0.22) in 2 groups had no significant difference.Conclusion:Desflurane produces a faster decrease and a recovery of SSEP amplitude as well as a better conscious state than propofol does.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the somatosensory-evoked potentials(SSEP) and the clinical recovery profiles of desflurane/nitrous oxide and propofol anesthesia during surgery to correct scoliosis.Methods:Twenty adolescent patients were randomized into 2 groups:desflurane/nitrous oxide anesthesia group(n=10) and propofol anesthesia group(n=10).An fentanil infusion was used for analgesia in both groups when needed.Results:Changes in anesthetic concentration of 2 drugs produced little effect on the latency of SSEP,but the effect on SSEP amplitude was significant(P0.05).Desflurane produced a faster decrease and recovery in SSEP than propofol did(P0.05).The recovery time for eye opening(mean 8.0 vs 20.1 min, P= 0.09) and toe movement(mean 7.7 vs 15.68 min,P=0.22) in 2 groups had no significant difference.Conclusion:Desflurane produces a faster decrease and a recovery of SSEP amplitude as well as a better conscious state than propofol does.

Key concepts: Desflurane, Propofol, Anesthesia, Somatosensory evoked potential, Nitrous oxide, Medicine, Anesthetic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Desflurane vs propofol anesthesia in influencing somatosensory evoked potential — Research Paper | ScholarLens