Influence of different nutrition support methods on the prognosis Of patients with severe acute pancreatitis
Jun Li
Abstract
Jun Li
Abstract
Objective To investigate the impact factors on different nutrition support methods on the prognosis of patients with severe acute pancreatic it is.Methods 66 patients with severe acute pancreatic it is divided randomly into three groups: enteral nutrition(EN) group,parenteral nutrition(PN) group and EN + PN group.After nutrition support treatment,levels of hem diastase(AMS) and several immunological indexes WBC in three groups were tested.The incidence of infections and complications,average hospital stay and the mortality rates were compared between two groups.Results Compared to EN groups and PN group,PN + EN group was associated with lower levels of AMS,WBC and lower incidences of pancreatic infection,infections in other sites,mortalities,the complications and average hospital stay(P 0.05).The differences in APACHEⅡscores and Balthazar scores among three groups also have statistical significance(P 0.05).Conclusion PN combined with EN may be the preferred and rational route of nutritional support in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To investigate the impact factors on different nutrition support methods on the prognosis of patients with severe acute pancreatic it is.Methods 66 patients with severe acute pancreatic it is divided randomly into three groups: enteral nutrition(EN) group,parenteral nutrition(PN) group and EN + PN group.After nutrition support treatment,levels of hem diastase(AMS) and several immunological indexes WBC in three groups were tested.The incidence of infections and complications,average hospital stay and the mortality rates were compared between two groups.Results Compared to EN groups and PN group,PN + EN group was associated with lower levels of AMS,WBC and lower incidences of pancreatic infection,infections in other sites,mortalities,the complications and average hospital stay(P 0.05).The differences in APACHEⅡscores and Balthazar scores among three groups also have statistical significance(P 0.05).Conclusion PN combined with EN may be the preferred and rational route of nutritional support in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
Key concepts: Medicine, Acute pancreatitis, Parenteral nutrition, Incidence (geometry), Internal medicine, Statistical significance, APACHE II, Pancreatitis