2008Journal of clinical researchRequires access

Application of Acute Hypervolemic Hemodilution in Spinal Internal Fixation Surgery

Tang Ya-zi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

[Objective] To observe the effectiveness and feasibility of Acute Hypervolemic Hemodilution(AHH)during the operation.[Methods] Twenty five ASAⅠ~Ⅱpatients scheduled for internal fixation surgery of thoracic/lumbar vertebrae under general anesthesia were divided into two groups :control group(groupⅠ)(n=12)and AHH(groupⅡ)(n=13).In group Ⅱ,patients were infused 6% HES(130/0.4,Voluven)in speed of 50 mL/min and with volume of 15 mL/kg after induction and before operation.AHH wasn't done in group Ⅰ.The hemodynamics,blood transfusion and blood loss of the two groups were compared.[Results] The intraoperative blood transfusion in group Ⅰand groupⅡ were(550±32)mL and(302±26)mL,respectively,and there were significant differences between them(P0.05).The intraoperative blood loss in group Ⅰand groupⅡ were(1058±330)mL and(1004±215)mL,respectively,and there were no significant differences between them(P0.05).Hematocrit(Hct)after AHH was more lower in group Ⅱ than that in groupⅠ,and there were significant changes between them(P0.05).There were no significant changes in two groups on heart rate(HR)and mean arterial pressure(MAP)at five time points in the study.Central venous pressure(CVP)was markedly increased after AHH in group Ⅱ,but all in normal.Differences on CVP didn't exist between two groups at T4.[Conclusion]AHH cannot decrease the intraoperative blood loss but can efficiently decrease the intraoperative blood transfusion.It can be safely used for major operation with fairly stable hemodynamics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Objective] To observe the effectiveness and feasibility of Acute Hypervolemic Hemodilution(AHH)during the operation.[Methods] Twenty five ASAⅠ~Ⅱpatients scheduled for internal fixation surgery of thoracic/lumbar vertebrae under general anesthesia were divided into two groups :control group(groupⅠ)(n=12)and AHH(groupⅡ)(n=13).In group Ⅱ,patients were infused 6% HES(130/0.4,Voluven)in speed of 50 mL/min and with volume of 15 mL/kg after induction and before operation.AHH wasn't done in group Ⅰ.The hemodynamics,blood transfusion and blood loss of the two groups were compared.[Results] The intraoperative blood transfusion in group Ⅰand groupⅡ were(550±32)mL and(302±26)mL,respectively,and there were significant differences between them(P0.05).The intraoperative blood loss in group Ⅰand groupⅡ were(1058±330)mL and(1004±215)mL,respectively,and there were no significant differences between them(P0.05).Hematocrit(Hct)after AHH was more lower in group Ⅱ than that in groupⅠ,and there were significant changes between them(P0.05).There were no significant changes in two groups on heart rate(HR)and mean arterial pressure(MAP)at five time points in the study.Central venous pressure(CVP)was markedly increased after AHH in group Ⅱ,but all in normal.Differences on CVP didn't exist between two groups at T4.[Conclusion]AHH cannot decrease the intraoperative blood loss but can efficiently decrease the intraoperative blood transfusion.It can be safely used for major operation with fairly stable hemodynamics.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Objective] To observe the effectiveness and feasibility of Acute Hypervolemic Hemodilution(AHH)during the operation.[Methods] Twenty five ASAⅠ~Ⅱpatients scheduled for internal fixation surgery of thoracic/lumbar vertebrae under general anesthesia were divided into two groups :control group(groupⅠ)(n=12)and AHH(groupⅡ)(n=13).In group Ⅱ,patients were infused 6% HES(130/0.4,Voluven)in speed of 50 mL/min and with volume of 15 mL/kg after induction and before operation.AHH wasn't done in group Ⅰ.The hemodynamics,blood transfusion and blood loss of the two groups were compared.[Results] The intraoperative blood transfusion in group Ⅰand groupⅡ were(550±32)mL and(302±26)mL,respectively,and there were significant differences between them(P0.05).The intraoperative blood loss in group Ⅰand groupⅡ were(1058±330)mL and(1004±215)mL,respectively,and there were no significant differences between them(P0.05).Hematocrit(Hct)after AHH was more lower in group Ⅱ than that in groupⅠ,and there were significant changes between them(P0.05).There were no significant changes in two groups on heart rate(HR)and mean arterial pressure(MAP)at five time points in the study.Central venous pressure(CVP)was markedly increased after AHH in group Ⅱ,but all in normal.Differences on CVP didn't exist between two groups at T4.[Conclusion]AHH cannot decrease the intraoperative blood loss but can efficiently decrease the intraoperative blood transfusion.It can be safely used for major operation with fairly stable hemodynamics.

Key concepts: Medicine, Hematocrit, Anesthesia, Hemodynamics, Central venous pressure, Internal fixation, Blood pressure, Blood volume

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of Acute Hypervolemic Hemodilution in Spinal Internal Fixation Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens