2015•Sport Science and TechnologyRequires access

Validation of Accelerometer and Activity Diary to Monitor Daily Physical Activity

Xiang Jian-fen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To test the validity of Actigraph GT3 Xaccelerometer and Bouchard activity diary on monitoring daily physical activity of youth,and provide experimental evidence for large sample size physical activity investigation.Methods:20participants took part in 4hphysical activity similar to the percentage of their daily life,validities of the 2 methods to monitor PAEE4 h,PAL and MVPA time were analyzed using the results of indirect calorimetry(IC)test as criterions.Results:1)The predicted PAL of Bouchard activity diary was not significantly different with IC test result(P0.05),while the predicted PAEE4 h was mildly higher than IC test result(predicted error was 12.81±17.02%,P0.05),the predicted MVPA time was significantly higher than IC test result(P0.01);2)GT3Xunderestimated PAEE4 h and PAL(P0.01),there was small difference between the predicted MVPA time of GT3 X and the IC test result after adjusted by bicycling time(P=0.04),the corresponding VM cutpoint was 2690counts/min;3)Bland-Altman plots indicated that the predicted values were acceptable for Bouchard physical activity diary to monitor PAEE4 hand PAL,as well as GT3 Xto monitor MVPA time.Conclusion:GT3X has good validity to monitor MVPA time,Bouchard activity diary has good validity to monitor PAL and PAEE4 h.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To test the validity of Actigraph GT3 Xaccelerometer and Bouchard activity diary on monitoring daily physical activity of youth,and provide experimental evidence for large sample size physical activity investigation.Methods:20participants took part in 4hphysical activity similar to the percentage of their daily life,validities of the 2 methods to monitor PAEE4 h,PAL and MVPA time were analyzed using the results of indirect calorimetry(IC)test as criterions.Results:1)The predicted PAL of Bouchard activity diary was not significantly different with IC test result(P0.05),while the predicted PAEE4 h was mildly higher than IC test result(predicted error was 12.81±17.02%,P0.05),the predicted MVPA time was significantly higher than IC test result(P0.01);2)GT3Xunderestimated PAEE4 h and PAL(P0.01),there was small difference between the predicted MVPA time of GT3 X and the IC test result after adjusted by bicycling time(P=0.04),the corresponding VM cutpoint was 2690counts/min;3)Bland-Altman plots indicated that the predicted values were acceptable for Bouchard physical activity diary to monitor PAEE4 hand PAL,as well as GT3 Xto monitor MVPA time.Conclusion:GT3X has good validity to monitor MVPA time,Bouchard activity diary has good validity to monitor PAL and PAEE4 h.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To test the validity of Actigraph GT3 Xaccelerometer and Bouchard activity diary on monitoring daily physical activity of youth,and provide experimental evidence for large sample size physical activity investigation.Methods:20participants took part in 4hphysical activity similar to the percentage of their daily life,validities of the 2 methods to monitor PAEE4 h,PAL and MVPA time were analyzed using the results of indirect calorimetry(IC)test as criterions.Results:1)The predicted PAL of Bouchard activity diary was not significantly different with IC test result(P0.05),while the predicted PAEE4 h was mildly higher than IC test result(predicted error was 12.81±17.02%,P0.05),the predicted MVPA time was significantly higher than IC test result(P0.01);2)GT3Xunderestimated PAEE4 h and PAL(P0.01),there was small difference between the predicted MVPA time of GT3 X and the IC test result after adjusted by bicycling time(P=0.04),the corresponding VM cutpoint was 2690counts/min;3)Bland-Altman plots indicated that the predicted values were acceptable for Bouchard physical activity diary to monitor PAEE4 hand PAL,as well as GT3 Xto monitor MVPA time.Conclusion:GT3X has good validity to monitor MVPA time,Bouchard activity diary has good validity to monitor PAL and PAEE4 h.

Key concepts: Physical activity, Activity monitor, Test (biology), Step test, Psychology, Medicine, Statistics, Physical therapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Validation of Accelerometer and Activity Diary to Monitor Daily Physical Activity — Research Paper | ScholarLens