Validation of Accelerometer and Activity Diary to Monitor Daily Physical Activity
Xiang Jian-fen
Abstract
Xiang Jian-fen
Abstract
Objective:To test the validity of Actigraph GT3 Xaccelerometer and Bouchard activity diary on monitoring daily physical activity of youth,and provide experimental evidence for large sample size physical activity investigation.Methods:20participants took part in 4hphysical activity similar to the percentage of their daily life,validities of the 2 methods to monitor PAEE4 h,PAL and MVPA time were analyzed using the results of indirect calorimetry(IC)test as criterions.Results:1)The predicted PAL of Bouchard activity diary was not significantly different with IC test result(P0.05),while the predicted PAEE4 h was mildly higher than IC test result(predicted error was 12.81±17.02%,P0.05),the predicted MVPA time was significantly higher than IC test result(P0.01);2)GT3Xunderestimated PAEE4 h and PAL(P0.01),there was small difference between the predicted MVPA time of GT3 X and the IC test result after adjusted by bicycling time(P=0.04),the corresponding VM cutpoint was 2690counts/min;3)Bland-Altman plots indicated that the predicted values were acceptable for Bouchard physical activity diary to monitor PAEE4 hand PAL,as well as GT3 Xto monitor MVPA time.Conclusion:GT3X has good validity to monitor MVPA time,Bouchard activity diary has good validity to monitor PAL and PAEE4 h.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To test the validity of Actigraph GT3 Xaccelerometer and Bouchard activity diary on monitoring daily physical activity of youth,and provide experimental evidence for large sample size physical activity investigation.Methods:20participants took part in 4hphysical activity similar to the percentage of their daily life,validities of the 2 methods to monitor PAEE4 h,PAL and MVPA time were analyzed using the results of indirect calorimetry(IC)test as criterions.Results:1)The predicted PAL of Bouchard activity diary was not significantly different with IC test result(P0.05),while the predicted PAEE4 h was mildly higher than IC test result(predicted error was 12.81±17.02%,P0.05),the predicted MVPA time was significantly higher than IC test result(P0.01);2)GT3Xunderestimated PAEE4 h and PAL(P0.01),there was small difference between the predicted MVPA time of GT3 X and the IC test result after adjusted by bicycling time(P=0.04),the corresponding VM cutpoint was 2690counts/min;3)Bland-Altman plots indicated that the predicted values were acceptable for Bouchard physical activity diary to monitor PAEE4 hand PAL,as well as GT3 Xto monitor MVPA time.Conclusion:GT3X has good validity to monitor MVPA time,Bouchard activity diary has good validity to monitor PAL and PAEE4 h.
Key concepts: Physical activity, Activity monitor, Test (biology), Step test, Psychology, Medicine, Statistics, Physical therapy