2008•Journal of clinical researchRequires access

Long-term Curative Effect and Visual Quality of Life in Myopia Patients After Different Keratorefractive Surgery

Jiang Chao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

【Objective】To compare long-term curative effect and visual quality of life in myopia patients after two kinds of keratorefractive surgery,i.e.radial keratotomy(RK) and laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK).【Methods】A total of 101 myopia eyes treated with RK were followed up for 12.1± 2.0 years,and 98 myopia eyes treated with LASIK were followed-up for 7.4± 0.2 years.The visual acuity, refraction,intraocular pressure(IOP),BUT,Schirmer testⅠand the result of questionnaire of visual quality of life were compared between two groups.【Results】The visual acuity of LASIK group was better than that of RK group.There was significantly statistical difference between the two groups.The myopia patients with-3.00D~-6.00D before surgery were-0.22±1.28D and-0.70±0.52D in RK and LASIK group,respectively.The myopia patients with ≥-6.25D before surgery were-1.02±1.25D and-1.06±0.13D in RK and LASIK group.IOP was 11.87±2.52mmHg and 11.31±2.20mmHg in RK and LASIK group.BUT was 5.3±4.7s and 8.0±3.6s in RK and LASIK group.Schirmer testⅠwas 14.5±9.0mm and 15.2±4.3mm in RK and LASIK group.The visual quality of life of LASIK group was better than that of RK group.【Conclusion】LASIK was more effective,more accurate and more satisfactory for visual quality of life than RK surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

【Objective】To compare long-term curative effect and visual quality of life in myopia patients after two kinds of keratorefractive surgery,i.e.radial keratotomy(RK) and laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK).【Methods】A total of 101 myopia eyes treated with RK were followed up for 12.1± 2.0 years,and 98 myopia eyes treated with LASIK were followed-up for 7.4± 0.2 years.The visual acuity, refraction,intraocular pressure(IOP),BUT,Schirmer testⅠand the result of questionnaire of visual quality of life were compared between two groups.【Results】The visual acuity of LASIK group was better than that of RK group.There was significantly statistical difference between the two groups.The myopia patients with-3.00D~-6.00D before surgery were-0.22±1.28D and-0.70±0.52D in RK and LASIK group,respectively.The myopia patients with ≥-6.25D before surgery were-1.02±1.25D and-1.06±0.13D in RK and LASIK group.IOP was 11.87±2.52mmHg and 11.31±2.20mmHg in RK and LASIK group.BUT was 5.3±4.7s and 8.0±3.6s in RK and LASIK group.Schirmer testⅠwas 14.5±9.0mm and 15.2±4.3mm in RK and LASIK group.The visual quality of life of LASIK group was better than that of RK group.【Conclusion】LASIK was more effective,more accurate and more satisfactory for visual quality of life than RK surgery.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

【Objective】To compare long-term curative effect and visual quality of life in myopia patients after two kinds of keratorefractive surgery,i.e.radial keratotomy(RK) and laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK).【Methods】A total of 101 myopia eyes treated with RK were followed up for 12.1± 2.0 years,and 98 myopia eyes treated with LASIK were followed-up for 7.4± 0.2 years.The visual acuity, refraction,intraocular pressure(IOP),BUT,Schirmer testⅠand the result of questionnaire of visual quality of life were compared between two groups.【Results】The visual acuity of LASIK group was better than that of RK group.There was significantly statistical difference between the two groups.The myopia patients with-3.00D~-6.00D before surgery were-0.22±1.28D and-0.70±0.52D in RK and LASIK group,respectively.The myopia patients with ≥-6.25D before surgery were-1.02±1.25D and-1.06±0.13D in RK and LASIK group.IOP was 11.87±2.52mmHg and 11.31±2.20mmHg in RK and LASIK group.BUT was 5.3±4.7s and 8.0±3.6s in RK and LASIK group.Schirmer testⅠwas 14.5±9.0mm and 15.2±4.3mm in RK and LASIK group.The visual quality of life of LASIK group was better than that of RK group.【Conclusion】LASIK was more effective,more accurate and more satisfactory for visual quality of life than RK surgery.

Key concepts: LASIK, Medicine, Keratomileusis, Ophthalmology, Visual acuity, Quality of life (healthcare), Refractive surgery, Radial keratotomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Long-term Curative Effect and Visual Quality of Life in Myopia Patients After Different Keratorefractive Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens