1999•Unpublished venueRequires access

Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Flunarizine Capsules in 10 Healthy Volunteers

Tao Jiang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of flunarizine capsule A(Bohai Pharmaceutical,Tangshan,lot No:970901) and capsule B(Xichuan Pharmaceutical, Henan, lot No: 970129). Methods: A single oral dose of 12mg flunarizine of each kind of capsules was given to 10 Chinese healthy male volunteers respectively in an open,randomized crossover study. Plasma levels were determined with HPLC UV method. Results: The plasma concentration time curve was fitted to 1 compartment open model with a first order and lag time absorption. The major pharmacokinetic parameters of capsule A and B were shown respectively as following:C max (43 7±6 2) mg·L -1 and (47 4±13 8) mg·L -1 ; T max (3 04±0 53)h and (3 28±1 04)h; T 1/2ka (1 14±0 68)h and (1 28±0 92)h; T 1/2ke ( 5 44±2 41)h and (5 53±2 71)h; AUC (507 0±151 0) mg·h·L 1 and (534 1±116 0) mg·h·L 1 ; MRT (8 20±1 53)h and (8 34±1 41)h. There were no significant differences between the pharmacokinetic parameters of capsule A and B. The relative bioavailability of the capsule A was 97 5%±30 9% of that of the capsule B. Conclusion: The two kinds of Flunarizine capsules had the equivalent biological effects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of flunarizine capsule A(Bohai Pharmaceutical,Tangshan,lot No:970901) and capsule B(Xichuan Pharmaceutical, Henan, lot No: 970129). Methods: A single oral dose of 12mg flunarizine of each kind of capsules was given to 10 Chinese healthy male volunteers respectively in an open,randomized crossover study. Plasma levels were determined with HPLC UV method. Results: The plasma concentration time curve was fitted to 1 compartment open model with a first order and lag time absorption. The major pharmacokinetic parameters of capsule A and B were shown respectively as following:C max (43 7±6 2) mg·L -1 and (47 4±13 8) mg·L -1 ; T max (3 04±0 53)h and (3 28±1 04)h; T 1/2ka (1 14±0 68)h and (1 28±0 92)h; T 1/2ke ( 5 44±2 41)h and (5 53±2 71)h; AUC (507 0±151 0) mg·h·L 1 and (534 1±116 0) mg·h·L 1 ; MRT (8 20±1 53)h and (8 34±1 41)h. There were no significant differences between the pharmacokinetic parameters of capsule A and B. The relative bioavailability of the capsule A was 97 5%±30 9% of that of the capsule B. Conclusion: The two kinds of Flunarizine capsules had the equivalent biological effects.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of flunarizine capsule A(Bohai Pharmaceutical,Tangshan,lot No:970901) and capsule B(Xichuan Pharmaceutical, Henan, lot No: 970129). Methods: A single oral dose of 12mg flunarizine of each kind of capsules was given to 10 Chinese healthy male volunteers respectively in an open,randomized crossover study. Plasma levels were determined with HPLC UV method. Results: The plasma concentration time curve was fitted to 1 compartment open model with a first order and lag time absorption. The major pharmacokinetic parameters of capsule A and B were shown respectively as following:C max (43 7±6 2) mg·L -1 and (47 4±13 8) mg·L -1 ; T max (3 04±0 53)h and (3 28±1 04)h; T 1/2ka (1 14±0 68)h and (1 28±0 92)h; T 1/2ke ( 5 44±2 41)h and (5 53±2 71)h; AUC (507 0±151 0) mg·h·L 1 and (534 1±116 0) mg·h·L 1 ; MRT (8 20±1 53)h and (8 34±1 41)h. There were no significant differences between the pharmacokinetic parameters of capsule A and B. The relative bioavailability of the capsule A was 97 5%±30 9% of that of the capsule B. Conclusion: The two kinds of Flunarizine capsules had the equivalent biological effects.

Key concepts: Bioavailability, Capsule, Pharmacokinetics, Flunarizine, Pharmacology, Crossover study, Absorption (acoustics), Plasma concentration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Flunarizine Capsules in 10 Healthy Volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens