Relative bioavailability of tramadol hydrochloride tablets in healthy volunteers
Qiao Hai-ling
Abstract
Qiao Hai-ling
Abstract
Aim: To study the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of tramadol hydrochloride tablets in healthy volunteers. Methods: Single oral doses of the standard formulation and the tested formulation were respectively given to 18 volunteers in randomized cross-over test. The tramadol concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC. Results: The concentration-time curves of two formulations fitted to one-compartment open model. The C max was (410.0±71.1) μg·L -1 and (427.0±57.1) μg·L -1; T max was (2.20±0.49) h and (2.20±0.55) h; T 1/2ke were (7.13±0.83) h and (7.08±0.74) h; AUCt 0 were (4 376±855) μg·h·L -1 and (4 514±1 068) μg·h·L -1; AUC∞ 0 were (5 184± 1 112) μg·h·L -1 and (5 241±1 330) μg·h·L -1,respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters showed no significant difference between the two formulations(P0.05).The relative bioavailability was (98.94±16.04)% of tested formulation. Conclusion: It is suggested that the two formulations be bioequivalent.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Aim: To study the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of tramadol hydrochloride tablets in healthy volunteers. Methods: Single oral doses of the standard formulation and the tested formulation were respectively given to 18 volunteers in randomized cross-over test. The tramadol concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC. Results: The concentration-time curves of two formulations fitted to one-compartment open model. The C max was (410.0±71.1) μg·L -1 and (427.0±57.1) μg·L -1; T max was (2.20±0.49) h and (2.20±0.55) h; T 1/2ke were (7.13±0.83) h and (7.08±0.74) h; AUCt 0 were (4 376±855) μg·h·L -1 and (4 514±1 068) μg·h·L -1; AUC∞ 0 were (5 184± 1 112) μg·h·L -1 and (5 241±1 330) μg·h·L -1,respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters showed no significant difference between the two formulations(P0.05).The relative bioavailability was (98.94±16.04)% of tested formulation. Conclusion: It is suggested that the two formulations be bioequivalent.
Key concepts: Bioavailability, Bioequivalence, Pharmacokinetics, Chemistry, Tramadol Hydrochloride, Pharmacology, Hydrochloride, High-performance liquid chromatography