Comparison of error control schemes in wireless sensor networks
Quanquan Liang
Abstract
Quanquan Liang
Abstract
Energy efficiency analyses of automatic repeat request (ARQ) and forward error correction (FEC) techniques were presented. Chase combining hybrid ARQ (HARQ) was proposed to achieve adaptive error control in wireless sensor networks. Moreover, Chase combining HARQ was compared with ARQ and FEC in terms of energy efficiency based on different communication distances and packet lengths. The simulation result shows that Chase combining HARQ is the optimal scheme on the whole.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Energy efficiency analyses of automatic repeat request (ARQ) and forward error correction (FEC) techniques were presented. Chase combining hybrid ARQ (HARQ) was proposed to achieve adaptive error control in wireless sensor networks. Moreover, Chase combining HARQ was compared with ARQ and FEC in terms of energy efficiency based on different communication distances and packet lengths. The simulation result shows that Chase combining HARQ is the optimal scheme on the whole.
Key concepts: Hybrid automatic repeat request, Automatic repeat request, Computer science, Selective Repeat ARQ, Error detection and correction, Network packet, Forward error correction, Wireless sensor network