2013•Fujian yiyao zazhiRequires access

Clinical significance of the combination detection of Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the liver cirrhosis patients complicated with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Lai Jingla

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the sensitivity and specificity of combination detection of Procalcitonin(PCT) and C-reactive protein(CRP) in the liver cirrhosis patients complicated with spontaneous bacteria1 peritonitis(SBP),and provide the evidence for clinical diagnosis.Methods The levels of PCT and CRP were detected in 45 liver cirrhosis patients complicated with SBP,45 liver cirrhosis patients without SBP and 45 general hepititis patients.Results Compared with general hepatitis patients,the levels of PCT and CRP in liver cirrhosis patients complicated with SBP were markedly higher(t=5.20,P0.05;t=7.94,P0.05);while,there were no significantly differences between liver cirrhosis group without SBP and general hepatitis group(t=1.17,P0.05;t=1.92,P0.05).The sensitivity and specificity of PCT were better than CRP.Conclusion It is more accurate to detect PCT and CRP together in early diagnosis of liver cirrhosis complicated with SBP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the sensitivity and specificity of combination detection of Procalcitonin(PCT) and C-reactive protein(CRP) in the liver cirrhosis patients complicated with spontaneous bacteria1 peritonitis(SBP),and provide the evidence for clinical diagnosis.Methods The levels of PCT and CRP were detected in 45 liver cirrhosis patients complicated with SBP,45 liver cirrhosis patients without SBP and 45 general hepititis patients.Results Compared with general hepatitis patients,the levels of PCT and CRP in liver cirrhosis patients complicated with SBP were markedly higher(t=5.20,P0.05;t=7.94,P0.05);while,there were no significantly differences between liver cirrhosis group without SBP and general hepatitis group(t=1.17,P0.05;t=1.92,P0.05).The sensitivity and specificity of PCT were better than CRP.Conclusion It is more accurate to detect PCT and CRP together in early diagnosis of liver cirrhosis complicated with SBP.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the sensitivity and specificity of combination detection of Procalcitonin(PCT) and C-reactive protein(CRP) in the liver cirrhosis patients complicated with spontaneous bacteria1 peritonitis(SBP),and provide the evidence for clinical diagnosis.Methods The levels of PCT and CRP were detected in 45 liver cirrhosis patients complicated with SBP,45 liver cirrhosis patients without SBP and 45 general hepititis patients.Results Compared with general hepatitis patients,the levels of PCT and CRP in liver cirrhosis patients complicated with SBP were markedly higher(t=5.20,P0.05;t=7.94,P0.05);while,there were no significantly differences between liver cirrhosis group without SBP and general hepatitis group(t=1.17,P0.05;t=1.92,P0.05).The sensitivity and specificity of PCT were better than CRP.Conclusion It is more accurate to detect PCT and CRP together in early diagnosis of liver cirrhosis complicated with SBP.

Key concepts: Procalcitonin, Cirrhosis, Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, Medicine, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, C-reactive protein, Hepatitis a virus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical significance of the combination detection of Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the liver cirrhosis patients complicated with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens