2009•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison between HC2 and PCR-RDB for detecting HPV infection in women

Lijuan Wu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2) to polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB) for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493) samples(Kappa =0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89) and 91.04%(61/67),respectively, when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00- 999.99 and≥1 000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(x~2=289.3,P0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2) to polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB) for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493) samples(Kappa =0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89) and 91.04%(61/67),respectively, when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00- 999.99 and≥1 000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(x~2=289.3,P0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare hybrid capture-Ⅱ(HC2) to polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-reverse dot-blot(RDB) for detecting HPV infection in women.Methods HC2 method and PCR-RDB were applied to detecting human papillomaviral infection in female genital duct,and the test results were analyzed.Results Concordant results were found in 81.14%(400/493) samples(Kappa =0.63;95%CI,0.57-0.69).The high risk type HPV positive rate detected by PCR-RDB were 1.60%(3/187),29.85%(20/67),69.88%(58/83),86.52%(77/89) and 91.04%(61/67),respectively, when the HC2 RLU/CO of samples were1.00,1.00-9.99,10.00-99.99,100.00- 999.99 and≥1 000.00.Statistical differences were found among the five groups(x~2=289.3,P0.01).Cross reactions were found between HC2 high risk probe and HPV53,66,11,cp8304 and other genotypes.Conclusion There is good concordance between HC2 and PCR-RDB,though cross reaction exists in HC2.Relatively speaking,there are more influential factors for PCR-RDB.

Key concepts: Concordance, Kappa, Internal medicine, Polymerase chain reaction, Genotype, Medicine, Gastroenterology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between HC2 and PCR-RDB for detecting HPV infection in women — Research Paper | ScholarLens