2007•PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of clinical outcomes of four protocols for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle].

Shiling Chen, Jinxia He, Hua-dong Song, Shuzhen Li, Xiaoning Liu, Li Hong, Fu-qi Xing

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcome of 4 protocols of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle to select the optimal endometrial preparation method for frozen-thawed embryos transfer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the 4 clinical protocols was conducted including natural cycle, down-regulated hormone replacement treatment (HRT) cycle, hMG cycle and natural cycle+hCG in endometrial preparation for 419 frozen-thawed embryos transfer cycle, and the clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, early abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate , ongoing pregnancy rate and delivery rate were compared between the 4 protocols. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the 4 groups with different clinical protocols in age, duration of infertility, reason of infertility, number of embryo transferred and endometrial thickness. The 4 protocols differed little in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, early abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and delivery rate in the four clinical protocols. CONCLUSION: The 4 clinical protocols for frozen-thawed embryos transfer all have favorable clinical outcome, and choice of a specific protocol should be made according to the a comprehensive consideration of the individual conditions of the patient.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcome of 4 protocols of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle to select the optimal endometrial preparation method for frozen-thawed embryos transfer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the 4 clinical protocols was conducted including natural cycle, down-regulated hormone replacement treatment (HRT) cycle, hMG cycle and natural cycle+hCG in endometrial preparation for 419 frozen-thawed embryos transfer cycle, and the clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, early abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate , ongoing pregnancy rate and delivery rate were compared between the 4 protocols. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the 4 groups with different clinical protocols in age, duration of infertility, reason of infertility, number of embryo transferred and endometrial thickness. The 4 protocols differed little in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, early abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and delivery rate in the four clinical protocols. CONCLUSION: The 4 clinical protocols for frozen-thawed embryos transfer all have favorable clinical outcome, and choice of a specific protocol should be made according to the a comprehensive consideration of the individual conditions of the patient.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcome of 4 protocols of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle to select the optimal endometrial preparation method for frozen-thawed embryos transfer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the 4 clinical protocols was conducted including natural cycle, down-regulated hormone replacement treatment (HRT) cycle, hMG cycle and natural cycle+hCG in endometrial preparation for 419 frozen-thawed embryos transfer cycle, and the clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, early abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate , ongoing pregnancy rate and delivery rate were compared between the 4 protocols. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the 4 groups with different clinical protocols in age, duration of infertility, reason of infertility, number of embryo transferred and endometrial thickness. The 4 protocols differed little in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, early abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and delivery rate in the four clinical protocols. CONCLUSION: The 4 clinical protocols for frozen-thawed embryos transfer all have favorable clinical outcome, and choice of a specific protocol should be made according to the a comprehensive consideration of the individual conditions of the patient.

Key concepts: Embryo transfer, Pregnancy rate, Pregnancy, Medicine, Gynecology, Infertility, Natural cycle, Ectopic pregnancy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of clinical outcomes of four protocols for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens