2003Unpublished venueRequires access

“Right of Life”,“Right of Life and Security”, “Right of Life and Health”: What shall be Adopted in Constitution——Perspective of Philosophy of Life in “SARS”

Yiming Wei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Traditional right of life shall be improved with respect to concepts and notions in time and then it can be adopted into the constitution. “Right of life and security” is more active and popular than “right of life”, is closer to the “right of existence” held by Chinese government. Only the “right of life and security” is helpful not only to correct the phenomenon of belittling citizens' life in the tradition and the actual reality but also to strengthen the awareness of responsibility of a state and society to rescue life jeopardy and make it consistent with the right of physical assistance in the constitution. It is improper to adopt the “right of life and health” in the constitution, because they are two different kinds of rights and there are no syncretic characters. What's more, the item of rights of the constitution has shown the right to health.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Traditional right of life shall be improved with respect to concepts and notions in time and then it can be adopted into the constitution. “Right of life and security” is more active and popular than “right of life”, is closer to the “right of existence” held by Chinese government. Only the “right of life and security” is helpful not only to correct the phenomenon of belittling citizens' life in the tradition and the actual reality but also to strengthen the awareness of responsibility of a state and society to rescue life jeopardy and make it consistent with the right of physical assistance in the constitution. It is improper to adopt the “right of life and health” in the constitution, because they are two different kinds of rights and there are no syncretic characters. What's more, the item of rights of the constitution has shown the right to health.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Traditional right of life shall be improved with respect to concepts and notions in time and then it can be adopted into the constitution. “Right of life and security” is more active and popular than “right of life”, is closer to the “right of existence” held by Chinese government. Only the “right of life and security” is helpful not only to correct the phenomenon of belittling citizens' life in the tradition and the actual reality but also to strengthen the awareness of responsibility of a state and society to rescue life jeopardy and make it consistent with the right of physical assistance in the constitution. It is improper to adopt the “right of life and health” in the constitution, because they are two different kinds of rights and there are no syncretic characters. What's more, the item of rights of the constitution has shown the right to health.

Key concepts: Constitution, Right to life, Perspective (graphical), Right to health, Law, Government (linguistics), Sociology, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
“Right of Life”,“Right of Life and Security”, “Right of Life and Health”: What shall be Adopted in Constitution——Perspective of Philosophy of Life in “SARS” — Research Paper | ScholarLens