1991The Professional Animal ScientistOpen access

Effect of Combinations of Feather Meal, Corn Gluten Meal, Soybean Meal, and Urea as Sources of Supplemental Protein on Nitrogen Balance and Characteristics of Rumen Contents of Cattle

John A. Rathmacher, T. W. Perry, Harald Essig, L.J. Bush

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Steers in metabolism stalls and ruminally cannulated steers were used in two separate 8 x 8 Latin Square experiments to evaluate several combinations of protein sources that supplied 33% of the total dietary protein. Protein sources compared were urea (U), hydrolyzed feather meal (HFM), hydrolyzed feather meal plus urea (HFM+U), soy-bean meal (SBM), hydrolyzed feathermeal plus soybean meal (HFM+SBM), corn gluten meal (CGM), corn gluten meal plus urea (CGM+U), and corn gluten meal plus soybean meal (CGM+SBM), with the combinations being a 50:50 CP mixture. There were no differences among protein sources compared in N retention (45.9 ± 5.09 g/d) or N retention as a percentage of N intake 29.8 + 3.24%). Hydrolyzed feather meal N was less (P<.05) digestible (64.0%) than that from U (73.7), HFM+U (68.4), SBM (72.6), HFM+SBM (69.3), CGM (70.0), CGM+U (71.6), or CGM+SBM (72.3). Urea-N digestibility was higher (P<.05) than was HFM+U-N and HFM+SBM-N. Blood urea-N was not affected by protein source at 2 h, but was higher (P<.05) for U at 4 and 6 h vs. other treatments. Ruminal fluid NH3-N and pH were increased (P<.05) by protein source at 2 and 4 h but not at 6 h. Total VFA concentrations were not affected by protein source at 2, 4, and 6 h. Urea or SBM used in combination with CGM or HFM may reduce the cost of protein supplementation without affecting N utilization by steers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Steers in metabolism stalls and ruminally cannulated steers were used in two separate 8 x 8 Latin Square experiments to evaluate several combinations of protein sources that supplied 33% of the total dietary protein. Protein sources compared were urea (U), hydrolyzed feather meal (HFM), hydrolyzed feather meal plus urea (HFM+U), soy-bean meal (SBM), hydrolyzed feathermeal plus soybean meal (HFM+SBM), corn gluten meal (CGM), corn gluten meal plus urea (CGM+U), and corn gluten meal plus soybean meal (CGM+SBM), with the combinations being a 50:50 CP mixture. There were no differences among protein sources compared in N retention (45.9 ± 5.09 g/d) or N retention as a percentage of N intake 29.8 + 3.24%). Hydrolyzed feather meal N was less (P<.05) digestible (64.0%) than that from U (73.7), HFM+U (68.4), SBM (72.6), HFM+SBM (69.3), CGM (70.0), CGM+U (71.6), or CGM+SBM (72.3). Urea-N digestibility was higher (P<.05) than was HFM+U-N and HFM+SBM-N. Blood urea-N was not affected by protein source at 2 h, but was higher (P<.05) for U at 4 and 6 h vs. other treatments. Ruminal fluid NH3-N and pH were increased (P<.05) by protein source at 2 and 4 h but not at 6 h. Total VFA concentrations were not affected by protein source at 2, 4, and 6 h. Urea or SBM used in combination with CGM or HFM may reduce the cost of protein supplementation without affecting N utilization by steers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Steers in metabolism stalls and ruminally cannulated steers were used in two separate 8 x 8 Latin Square experiments to evaluate several combinations of protein sources that supplied 33% of the total dietary protein. Protein sources compared were urea (U), hydrolyzed feather meal (HFM), hydrolyzed feather meal plus urea (HFM+U), soy-bean meal (SBM), hydrolyzed feathermeal plus soybean meal (HFM+SBM), corn gluten meal (CGM), corn gluten meal plus urea (CGM+U), and corn gluten meal plus soybean meal (CGM+SBM), with the combinations being a 50:50 CP mixture. There were no differences among protein sources compared in N retention (45.9 ± 5.09 g/d) or N retention as a percentage of N intake 29.8 + 3.24%). Hydrolyzed feather meal N was less (P<.05) digestible (64.0%) than that from U (73.7), HFM+U (68.4), SBM (72.6), HFM+SBM (69.3), CGM (70.0), CGM+U (71.6), or CGM+SBM (72.3). Urea-N digestibility was higher (P<.05) than was HFM+U-N and HFM+SBM-N. Blood urea-N was not affected by protein source at 2 h, but was higher (P<.05) for U at 4 and 6 h vs. other treatments. Ruminal fluid NH3-N and pH were increased (P<.05) by protein source at 2 and 4 h but not at 6 h. Total VFA concentrations were not affected by protein source at 2, 4, and 6 h. Urea or SBM used in combination with CGM or HFM may reduce the cost of protein supplementation without affecting N utilization by steers.

Key concepts: Feather meal, Corn gluten meal, Soybean meal, Latin square, Urea, Chemistry, Gluten, Rumen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Combinations of Feather Meal, Corn Gluten Meal, Soybean Meal, and Urea as Sources of Supplemental Protein on Nitrogen Balance and Characteristics of Rumen Contents of Cattle — Research Paper | ScholarLens