2013•Coal Geology & ExplorationRequires access

Stress sensitivity and difference of porosity and permeability in coal reservoirs in Hangcheng CBM block

Lyu Yumi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In order to discuss the relationships between the physical properties of coal reservoir and the stress, the stress sensitivity experiments of the porosity and permeability of the coal samples from No.3, No.5 and No.11 coal seams in Hancheng coalbed methane(CBM) block were carried out under various pressure and the corresponding mathematical models were established. The results showed that the porosity and permeability of the samples decrease as the confining stress increases and the stress damage for permeability is much larger than that for porosity.However, the stress damage is different for different coal seams. When the confining stress increased from 4.14MPa(600 psi) to 12.42 MPa(1800 psi), the stress damage of the sample from No.11 coal seam was highest in the samples from three coal seams, with the porosity damage of 76.5% and permeability damage of 93.3%, that from No.3 coal seam was lowest with the porosity damage of 38.5% and permeability damage of 77.9%, and that from No.5 coal seam is relative high with the porosity damage of about 45% and permeability damage of 83.9%. It was suggested that the occurrence of the fractures in coal is resulted mainly from the stress damage difference among the coal seams. Additionally, the power function is more accurate than exponential function for fitting the measured value of porosity and permeability in the range of test stress.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to discuss the relationships between the physical properties of coal reservoir and the stress, the stress sensitivity experiments of the porosity and permeability of the coal samples from No.3, No.5 and No.11 coal seams in Hancheng coalbed methane(CBM) block were carried out under various pressure and the corresponding mathematical models were established. The results showed that the porosity and permeability of the samples decrease as the confining stress increases and the stress damage for permeability is much larger than that for porosity.However, the stress damage is different for different coal seams. When the confining stress increased from 4.14MPa(600 psi) to 12.42 MPa(1800 psi), the stress damage of the sample from No.11 coal seam was highest in the samples from three coal seams, with the porosity damage of 76.5% and permeability damage of 93.3%, that from No.3 coal seam was lowest with the porosity damage of 38.5% and permeability damage of 77.9%, and that from No.5 coal seam is relative high with the porosity damage of about 45% and permeability damage of 83.9%. It was suggested that the occurrence of the fractures in coal is resulted mainly from the stress damage difference among the coal seams. Additionally, the power function is more accurate than exponential function for fitting the measured value of porosity and permeability in the range of test stress.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to discuss the relationships between the physical properties of coal reservoir and the stress, the stress sensitivity experiments of the porosity and permeability of the coal samples from No.3, No.5 and No.11 coal seams in Hancheng coalbed methane(CBM) block were carried out under various pressure and the corresponding mathematical models were established. The results showed that the porosity and permeability of the samples decrease as the confining stress increases and the stress damage for permeability is much larger than that for porosity.However, the stress damage is different for different coal seams. When the confining stress increased from 4.14MPa(600 psi) to 12.42 MPa(1800 psi), the stress damage of the sample from No.11 coal seam was highest in the samples from three coal seams, with the porosity damage of 76.5% and permeability damage of 93.3%, that from No.3 coal seam was lowest with the porosity damage of 38.5% and permeability damage of 77.9%, and that from No.5 coal seam is relative high with the porosity damage of about 45% and permeability damage of 83.9%. It was suggested that the occurrence of the fractures in coal is resulted mainly from the stress damage difference among the coal seams. Additionally, the power function is more accurate than exponential function for fitting the measured value of porosity and permeability in the range of test stress.

Key concepts: Porosity, Coalbed methane, Permeability (electromagnetism), Coal, Coal mining, Overburden pressure, Geology, Effective stress

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Stress sensitivity and difference of porosity and permeability in coal reservoirs in Hangcheng CBM block — Research Paper | ScholarLens