2011Beijing Xingzheng Xueyuan xuebaoRequires access

A Brief Discussion on the Main Formats of the Debate between Chinese and Western Philosophy in the Late Ming Dynasty

Zhang Yao-na

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

main formats of the debate between Chinese and Western philosophy in the late Ming Dynasty are: Aristotle's theory on Four Causes vs.Taoist Not-beingand Buddhist Emptiness;Western philosophy's Entities-propertiesvs.Chinese philosophy's Tai Chi and The first rational;interpreting the order of Thing and The first by Priority to time;accounting for The first rational begets all things of the world by Western philosophy's The theory of universe generation;Western philosophy's The theory of Tabula Rasa vs.Confucian Man's nature at birth is good and The theory of returning to one's origin;interpreting Confucian and Righteousness by Western philosophy's Epistemology;replacing Confucian Academics with Western Academics;replacing Confucian The concept of life and death with Western The concept of life and death;discussing the issue of language in Chinese and Western philosophy;changing Chinese Benevolence means the unity of all things under heaven into Western philosophy'sOpinion;interpreting Chinese philosophy'sQiby Western philosophy's Materialand Form;interpretingTai ChibyArche;interpreting Chinese philosophy's Evil by Western philosophy's Sin;opposite concepts of soul between Chinese and Western philosophy;WesternRigidityvs.Chinese Go for the feeling;Western philosophy's Ontology vs.Chinese philosophy and so on.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

main formats of the debate between Chinese and Western philosophy in the late Ming Dynasty are: Aristotle's theory on Four Causes vs.Taoist Not-beingand Buddhist Emptiness;Western philosophy's Entities-propertiesvs.Chinese philosophy's Tai Chi and The first rational;interpreting the order of Thing and The first by Priority to time;accounting for The first rational begets all things of the world by Western philosophy's The theory of universe generation;Western philosophy's The theory of Tabula Rasa vs.Confucian Man's nature at birth is good and The theory of returning to one's origin;interpreting Confucian and Righteousness by Western philosophy's Epistemology;replacing Confucian Academics with Western Academics;replacing Confucian The concept of life and death with Western The concept of life and death;discussing the issue of language in Chinese and Western philosophy;changing Chinese Benevolence means the unity of all things under heaven into Western philosophy'sOpinion;interpreting Chinese philosophy'sQiby Western philosophy's Materialand Form;interpretingTai ChibyArche;interpreting Chinese philosophy's Evil by Western philosophy's Sin;opposite concepts of soul between Chinese and Western philosophy;WesternRigidityvs.Chinese Go for the feeling;Western philosophy's Ontology vs.Chinese philosophy and so on.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

main formats of the debate between Chinese and Western philosophy in the late Ming Dynasty are: Aristotle's theory on Four Causes vs.Taoist Not-beingand Buddhist Emptiness;Western philosophy's Entities-propertiesvs.Chinese philosophy's Tai Chi and The first rational;interpreting the order of Thing and The first by Priority to time;accounting for The first rational begets all things of the world by Western philosophy's The theory of universe generation;Western philosophy's The theory of Tabula Rasa vs.Confucian Man's nature at birth is good and The theory of returning to one's origin;interpreting Confucian and Righteousness by Western philosophy's Epistemology;replacing Confucian Academics with Western Academics;replacing Confucian The concept of life and death with Western The concept of life and death;discussing the issue of language in Chinese and Western philosophy;changing Chinese Benevolence means the unity of all things under heaven into Western philosophy'sOpinion;interpreting Chinese philosophy'sQiby Western philosophy's Materialand Form;interpretingTai ChibyArche;interpreting Chinese philosophy's Evil by Western philosophy's Sin;opposite concepts of soul between Chinese and Western philosophy;WesternRigidityvs.Chinese Go for the feeling;Western philosophy's Ontology vs.Chinese philosophy and so on.

Key concepts: Chinese philosophy, Western philosophy, Eastern philosophy, Philosophy, Heaven, Ancient philosophy, 20th-century philosophy, Western thought

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Brief Discussion on the Main Formats of the Debate between Chinese and Western Philosophy in the Late Ming Dynasty — Research Paper | ScholarLens