2013Journal of agricultural machinery and bioresources engineering.Open access

Evaluation of Mechanical Transplanter in Unpuddled Transplanting of Wet Season Rice in Sandy Loam Soil

A. K. M. Saiful Islam, M. A. Rahman, Md. Anwar Hossen, T. H. Ansari, Biswajit Karmakar

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Alternate to puddling, unpuddled transplanting is a new concept of rice cultivation. This experiment was conducted to evaluate the performance of mechanical rice transplanter in unpuddled condition under minimum tillage practices in drought prone zone representing sandy loam soil in wet season 2012. Tillage treatments were (i) conventional puddling (CT) in puddled condition and (ii) no tillage (NT) (iii) bed planting (BP) (iv) and strip tillage (ST) in unpuddled condition. Results indicated that unpuddled transplanting saved fuel, time and labour remarkably in land preparation. Mechanical transplanting reduced drudgery of the farmers and ensured timely operation. Transplanting time was higher in unpuddled plot than puddle one. Floating hill was also higher in unpuddled plot due to increase in soil hardness and unable to provide proper anchorage and gripping force to seedlings. Grain yield of unpuddled transplanting was similar to puddled transplanting. Water productivity was the lowest in unpuddled than puddled transplanting. Input cost was higher in conventional puddling than unpuddled transplanting. Mechanical transplanting overcome the constraints of manual transplanting in unpuddled condition. It might be an effective technology in rice production with limited seedling floating (9-17%) in sandy loam soil.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Alternate to puddling, unpuddled transplanting is a new concept of rice cultivation. This experiment was conducted to evaluate the performance of mechanical rice transplanter in unpuddled condition under minimum tillage practices in drought prone zone representing sandy loam soil in wet season 2012. Tillage treatments were (i) conventional puddling (CT) in puddled condition and (ii) no tillage (NT) (iii) bed planting (BP) (iv) and strip tillage (ST) in unpuddled condition. Results indicated that unpuddled transplanting saved fuel, time and labour remarkably in land preparation. Mechanical transplanting reduced drudgery of the farmers and ensured timely operation. Transplanting time was higher in unpuddled plot than puddle one. Floating hill was also higher in unpuddled plot due to increase in soil hardness and unable to provide proper anchorage and gripping force to seedlings. Grain yield of unpuddled transplanting was similar to puddled transplanting. Water productivity was the lowest in unpuddled than puddled transplanting. Input cost was higher in conventional puddling than unpuddled transplanting. Mechanical transplanting overcome the constraints of manual transplanting in unpuddled condition. It might be an effective technology in rice production with limited seedling floating (9-17%) in sandy loam soil.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Alternate to puddling, unpuddled transplanting is a new concept of rice cultivation. This experiment was conducted to evaluate the performance of mechanical rice transplanter in unpuddled condition under minimum tillage practices in drought prone zone representing sandy loam soil in wet season 2012. Tillage treatments were (i) conventional puddling (CT) in puddled condition and (ii) no tillage (NT) (iii) bed planting (BP) (iv) and strip tillage (ST) in unpuddled condition. Results indicated that unpuddled transplanting saved fuel, time and labour remarkably in land preparation. Mechanical transplanting reduced drudgery of the farmers and ensured timely operation. Transplanting time was higher in unpuddled plot than puddle one. Floating hill was also higher in unpuddled plot due to increase in soil hardness and unable to provide proper anchorage and gripping force to seedlings. Grain yield of unpuddled transplanting was similar to puddled transplanting. Water productivity was the lowest in unpuddled than puddled transplanting. Input cost was higher in conventional puddling than unpuddled transplanting. Mechanical transplanting overcome the constraints of manual transplanting in unpuddled condition. It might be an effective technology in rice production with limited seedling floating (9-17%) in sandy loam soil.

Key concepts: Puddling, Transplanting, Tillage, Loam, Agronomy, Sowing, Mathematics, Strip-till

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Mechanical Transplanter in Unpuddled Transplanting of Wet Season Rice in Sandy Loam Soil — Research Paper | ScholarLens