2004Qianwei Journal of MedicineRequires access

The curative effect observation of Indiana pouch procedure: A report of 75 cases

Sonja Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To assess the long term effect of indiana pouch procedure after total cystectomy. Methods The Indiana-pouch procedure had been improved as follows: after the end of ureter being made as nipple-like, it was implanted into the pouch with a tunnel way under bladder mucous for more than 2.0cm at least. So there were double ways to anti-reflux of urine. The process of pouch mucous was ameliorated too. Result After being follow-ups of half a year, the mean capacity of pouch was 610ml (520-900ml) and the mean filling pressure of the pouch was 10.4+2.8cmH2O. There was no evidence of ureter reflux and hydroneophrosis. Conclusions Indiana pouch procedure is fairly good for urinary diversion with high capacity, low pressure, minimal complications and catheteritation being easy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To assess the long term effect of indiana pouch procedure after total cystectomy. Methods The Indiana-pouch procedure had been improved as follows: after the end of ureter being made as nipple-like, it was implanted into the pouch with a tunnel way under bladder mucous for more than 2.0cm at least. So there were double ways to anti-reflux of urine. The process of pouch mucous was ameliorated too. Result After being follow-ups of half a year, the mean capacity of pouch was 610ml (520-900ml) and the mean filling pressure of the pouch was 10.4+2.8cmH2O. There was no evidence of ureter reflux and hydroneophrosis. Conclusions Indiana pouch procedure is fairly good for urinary diversion with high capacity, low pressure, minimal complications and catheteritation being easy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To assess the long term effect of indiana pouch procedure after total cystectomy. Methods The Indiana-pouch procedure had been improved as follows: after the end of ureter being made as nipple-like, it was implanted into the pouch with a tunnel way under bladder mucous for more than 2.0cm at least. So there were double ways to anti-reflux of urine. The process of pouch mucous was ameliorated too. Result After being follow-ups of half a year, the mean capacity of pouch was 610ml (520-900ml) and the mean filling pressure of the pouch was 10.4+2.8cmH2O. There was no evidence of ureter reflux and hydroneophrosis. Conclusions Indiana pouch procedure is fairly good for urinary diversion with high capacity, low pressure, minimal complications and catheteritation being easy.

Key concepts: Pouch, Medicine, Cystectomy, Urinary diversion, Reflux, Ureter, Surgery, Urology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The curative effect observation of Indiana pouch procedure: A report of 75 cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens