A comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and multi-slice spiral CT in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma
Yan-Zhen Lin
Abstract
Yan-Zhen Lin
Abstract
[Objective] To investigate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma. [Methods] MRI and MSCT were performed in 27 patients with gastric carcinoma proved by means of biopsy, and the results were compared with postoperative pathologic findings. [Results] The accuracy of MRI and MSCT in T staging was 81.5% (T1 100%, T2 57.1%, T3 81.8%, T4 100%, respectively) and 77.8% (T1 100%, T2 57.1%, T3 72.7%, T4 100%, respectively), respectively, and there was no statistical difference (P 0.05). The accuracy of MRI and MSCT in N staging was 63.6% (N0 77.8%, N1 60.0%, N2 50.0%, respectively) and 72.7% (N0 66.7%, N1 80.0%, N2 75.0%, respectively), respectively. Although there was no statistical difference(P 0.05), the accuracy for N staging and the sensitivity for lymph node metastasis with MSCT were slightly higher than those with MRI. The accuracy of MRI in M staging was equal to that of MSCT. In addition, there was no statistical difference between MRI and MSCT in the overall accuracy of TNM staging (P 0.05). [Conclusion] MRI cannot replace MSCT in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma because of its limitation in N staging.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
[Objective] To investigate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma. [Methods] MRI and MSCT were performed in 27 patients with gastric carcinoma proved by means of biopsy, and the results were compared with postoperative pathologic findings. [Results] The accuracy of MRI and MSCT in T staging was 81.5% (T1 100%, T2 57.1%, T3 81.8%, T4 100%, respectively) and 77.8% (T1 100%, T2 57.1%, T3 72.7%, T4 100%, respectively), respectively, and there was no statistical difference (P 0.05). The accuracy of MRI and MSCT in N staging was 63.6% (N0 77.8%, N1 60.0%, N2 50.0%, respectively) and 72.7% (N0 66.7%, N1 80.0%, N2 75.0%, respectively), respectively. Although there was no statistical difference(P 0.05), the accuracy for N staging and the sensitivity for lymph node metastasis with MSCT were slightly higher than those with MRI. The accuracy of MRI in M staging was equal to that of MSCT. In addition, there was no statistical difference between MRI and MSCT in the overall accuracy of TNM staging (P 0.05). [Conclusion] MRI cannot replace MSCT in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma because of its limitation in N staging.
Key concepts: Medicine, Magnetic resonance imaging, Radiology, Gastric carcinoma, Carcinoma, Lymph node metastasis, Spiral computed tomography, Nuclear medicine