2005Zhongguo xiandai yixue/Zhongguo xiandai yixue zazhiRequires access

A comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and multi-slice spiral CT in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma

Yan-Zhen Lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

[Objective] To investigate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma. [Methods] MRI and MSCT were performed in 27 patients with gastric carcinoma proved by means of biopsy, and the results were compared with postoperative pathologic findings. [Results] The accuracy of MRI and MSCT in T staging was 81.5% (T1 100%, T2 57.1%, T3 81.8%, T4 100%, respectively) and 77.8% (T1 100%, T2 57.1%, T3 72.7%, T4 100%, respectively), respectively, and there was no statistical difference (P 0.05). The accuracy of MRI and MSCT in N staging was 63.6% (N0 77.8%, N1 60.0%, N2 50.0%, respectively) and 72.7% (N0 66.7%, N1 80.0%, N2 75.0%, respectively), respectively. Although there was no statistical difference(P 0.05), the accuracy for N staging and the sensitivity for lymph node metastasis with MSCT were slightly higher than those with MRI. The accuracy of MRI in M staging was equal to that of MSCT. In addition, there was no statistical difference between MRI and MSCT in the overall accuracy of TNM staging (P 0.05). [Conclusion] MRI cannot replace MSCT in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma because of its limitation in N staging.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Objective] To investigate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma. [Methods] MRI and MSCT were performed in 27 patients with gastric carcinoma proved by means of biopsy, and the results were compared with postoperative pathologic findings. [Results] The accuracy of MRI and MSCT in T staging was 81.5% (T1 100%, T2 57.1%, T3 81.8%, T4 100%, respectively) and 77.8% (T1 100%, T2 57.1%, T3 72.7%, T4 100%, respectively), respectively, and there was no statistical difference (P 0.05). The accuracy of MRI and MSCT in N staging was 63.6% (N0 77.8%, N1 60.0%, N2 50.0%, respectively) and 72.7% (N0 66.7%, N1 80.0%, N2 75.0%, respectively), respectively. Although there was no statistical difference(P 0.05), the accuracy for N staging and the sensitivity for lymph node metastasis with MSCT were slightly higher than those with MRI. The accuracy of MRI in M staging was equal to that of MSCT. In addition, there was no statistical difference between MRI and MSCT in the overall accuracy of TNM staging (P 0.05). [Conclusion] MRI cannot replace MSCT in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma because of its limitation in N staging.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Objective] To investigate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma. [Methods] MRI and MSCT were performed in 27 patients with gastric carcinoma proved by means of biopsy, and the results were compared with postoperative pathologic findings. [Results] The accuracy of MRI and MSCT in T staging was 81.5% (T1 100%, T2 57.1%, T3 81.8%, T4 100%, respectively) and 77.8% (T1 100%, T2 57.1%, T3 72.7%, T4 100%, respectively), respectively, and there was no statistical difference (P 0.05). The accuracy of MRI and MSCT in N staging was 63.6% (N0 77.8%, N1 60.0%, N2 50.0%, respectively) and 72.7% (N0 66.7%, N1 80.0%, N2 75.0%, respectively), respectively. Although there was no statistical difference(P 0.05), the accuracy for N staging and the sensitivity for lymph node metastasis with MSCT were slightly higher than those with MRI. The accuracy of MRI in M staging was equal to that of MSCT. In addition, there was no statistical difference between MRI and MSCT in the overall accuracy of TNM staging (P 0.05). [Conclusion] MRI cannot replace MSCT in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma because of its limitation in N staging.

Key concepts: Medicine, Magnetic resonance imaging, Radiology, Gastric carcinoma, Carcinoma, Lymph node metastasis, Spiral computed tomography, Nuclear medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and multi-slice spiral CT in preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens