2005•Journal of Shenyang UniversityRequires access

Brief Survey of Organization Method of Network Information Resources

Zuo Feifei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The characteristic of network information resources is analyzed. The advantage and limitation of the organization method of network information resources via traditional classification are discussed. Brings forward some thought as well as the future prospects for the development of organization method of network information resources.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The characteristic of network information resources is analyzed. The advantage and limitation of the organization method of network information resources via traditional classification are discussed. Brings forward some thought as well as the future prospects for the development of organization method of network information resources.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The characteristic of network information resources is analyzed. The advantage and limitation of the organization method of network information resources via traditional classification are discussed. Brings forward some thought as well as the future prospects for the development of organization method of network information resources.

Key concepts: Computer science, Information resource, Knowledge management, Organizational network analysis, Data science, Organizational learning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Brief Survey of Organization Method of Network Information Resources — Research Paper | ScholarLens