2002The Chinese Journal of Clinical PharmacologyRequires access

Double-blind Comparison between Rispendone and Haloperidol in the Treatment of Schizophrenic Patients

Hong Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of risperidone and haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenic. METHODS:A hundred and one schizophrenic patients were randomly assigned to two groups given oral doses of risperidone (2 to 6mg·d-1, 51 cases) or haloperidol (6 to 18 mg·d-1, 50 cases) in a double-blind parallel way for 6 weeks. PANSS and a 4-score clinical impression of efficacy were used to measure the efficacy. Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) and Treatment Emergent Side-Effect Scale (TESS) were used to measure adverse effects. RESULTS: The response rates were 68.6% and 60.0% for risperidone and haloperidol, respectively (P0.05). Both of the drugs were effective in the positive, negative and general psychopathological symptoms while no significant differences were detected between groups. The SAS total scores were significantly lower in risperidone than in haloperidol group. Less muscular tension, tremor, akathesia were seen in risperidone than in haloperidol group (P0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of risperidone is comparable to that of haloperidol. The prevalence of EPS of risperidone in recommended dose range is significantly lower than that of haloperidol.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of risperidone and haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenic. METHODS:A hundred and one schizophrenic patients were randomly assigned to two groups given oral doses of risperidone (2 to 6mg·d-1, 51 cases) or haloperidol (6 to 18 mg·d-1, 50 cases) in a double-blind parallel way for 6 weeks. PANSS and a 4-score clinical impression of efficacy were used to measure the efficacy. Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) and Treatment Emergent Side-Effect Scale (TESS) were used to measure adverse effects. RESULTS: The response rates were 68.6% and 60.0% for risperidone and haloperidol, respectively (P0.05). Both of the drugs were effective in the positive, negative and general psychopathological symptoms while no significant differences were detected between groups. The SAS total scores were significantly lower in risperidone than in haloperidol group. Less muscular tension, tremor, akathesia were seen in risperidone than in haloperidol group (P0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of risperidone is comparable to that of haloperidol. The prevalence of EPS of risperidone in recommended dose range is significantly lower than that of haloperidol.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of risperidone and haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenic. METHODS:A hundred and one schizophrenic patients were randomly assigned to two groups given oral doses of risperidone (2 to 6mg·d-1, 51 cases) or haloperidol (6 to 18 mg·d-1, 50 cases) in a double-blind parallel way for 6 weeks. PANSS and a 4-score clinical impression of efficacy were used to measure the efficacy. Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) and Treatment Emergent Side-Effect Scale (TESS) were used to measure adverse effects. RESULTS: The response rates were 68.6% and 60.0% for risperidone and haloperidol, respectively (P0.05). Both of the drugs were effective in the positive, negative and general psychopathological symptoms while no significant differences were detected between groups. The SAS total scores were significantly lower in risperidone than in haloperidol group. Less muscular tension, tremor, akathesia were seen in risperidone than in haloperidol group (P0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of risperidone is comparable to that of haloperidol. The prevalence of EPS of risperidone in recommended dose range is significantly lower than that of haloperidol.

Key concepts: Haloperidol, Risperidone, Psychopathology, Double blind, Adverse effect, Psychology, Dopamine antagonist, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Double-blind Comparison between Rispendone and Haloperidol in the Treatment of Schizophrenic Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens