2004Journal of medical imagingRequires access

CT diagnosis of ovarian gigantic cystic lesions(analysis of 13 cases)

Lin Zheng-y, CT Division

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the CT diagnostic efficacy for localization and characterization of ovarian gigantic cystic lesions.Methods:CT findings of 13 patients with ovarian gigantic cystic lesions proved by surgery and pathology were studied retrospectively analyzed. There were 6 cases with malignant cystic lesions, 7 cases with beningn cystic lesions.Results:There is some difference between the CT manifestation and localization of ovarian gigantic cystic lesions and documentary report. In this study, 4 cases appears localizational error. 3 cases with benign lesions was misdiagnosed malignant, 2 cases with malignant lesions was misdiagnosed benign. The diagnosing rate about localization and characterization is lower than reported obviously. The nodule which in or outside the cystic wall is one of the differential signs between benign and malignant lesions. But in this study, it appears nodule in the cystic wall and septa, in the 3 cases benign lesions, 1 case with non-nodular cystic lesions was confirmed malignant after operation.Conclusion:The CT fixed position of gigantic cystic lesions can appear error. When combined with B-ultrasound, the diagnosing rate can be improved. When the nodule appears in the cystic wall, the number of nodule is one of differential signs between benign and malignant lesions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To evaluate the CT diagnostic efficacy for localization and characterization of ovarian gigantic cystic lesions.Methods:CT findings of 13 patients with ovarian gigantic cystic lesions proved by surgery and pathology were studied retrospectively analyzed. There were 6 cases with malignant cystic lesions, 7 cases with beningn cystic lesions.Results:There is some difference between the CT manifestation and localization of ovarian gigantic cystic lesions and documentary report. In this study, 4 cases appears localizational error. 3 cases with benign lesions was misdiagnosed malignant, 2 cases with malignant lesions was misdiagnosed benign. The diagnosing rate about localization and characterization is lower than reported obviously. The nodule which in or outside the cystic wall is one of the differential signs between benign and malignant lesions. But in this study, it appears nodule in the cystic wall and septa, in the 3 cases benign lesions, 1 case with non-nodular cystic lesions was confirmed malignant after operation.Conclusion:The CT fixed position of gigantic cystic lesions can appear error. When combined with B-ultrasound, the diagnosing rate can be improved. When the nodule appears in the cystic wall, the number of nodule is one of differential signs between benign and malignant lesions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To evaluate the CT diagnostic efficacy for localization and characterization of ovarian gigantic cystic lesions.Methods:CT findings of 13 patients with ovarian gigantic cystic lesions proved by surgery and pathology were studied retrospectively analyzed. There were 6 cases with malignant cystic lesions, 7 cases with beningn cystic lesions.Results:There is some difference between the CT manifestation and localization of ovarian gigantic cystic lesions and documentary report. In this study, 4 cases appears localizational error. 3 cases with benign lesions was misdiagnosed malignant, 2 cases with malignant lesions was misdiagnosed benign. The diagnosing rate about localization and characterization is lower than reported obviously. The nodule which in or outside the cystic wall is one of the differential signs between benign and malignant lesions. But in this study, it appears nodule in the cystic wall and septa, in the 3 cases benign lesions, 1 case with non-nodular cystic lesions was confirmed malignant after operation.Conclusion:The CT fixed position of gigantic cystic lesions can appear error. When combined with B-ultrasound, the diagnosing rate can be improved. When the nodule appears in the cystic wall, the number of nodule is one of differential signs between benign and malignant lesions.

Key concepts: Medicine, Differential diagnosis, Nodule (geology), Radiology, Ultrasound, Pathology, Biology, Paleontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CT diagnosis of ovarian gigantic cystic lesions(analysis of 13 cases) — Research Paper | ScholarLens