2010Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsRequires access

The Critical Reflection on Praxis

Mingcai Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Every advanced theory must find out its theoretical boundaries after making criticism,every vulgarized theory only can develop its theoretical vitality after making criticism. It is time to criticize practical category that open up a new road of understanding Marxism. According to means of Aristotle's dividing categories,we can divide all things into the entity and the attribute of entity,and so this paper reflects on praxis through four aspects:practical subject,practical object,praxis and theory,practical rationality and practical irrationality. Individual is practical subject,starting and source. Collective praxis and class praxis start from individual praxis; society,productive forces,and relations of production are not practical subject. Praxis and theory can have the same objects,between practical process,man and nature,man and world,freedom and law integrate. Prudence and practice appeal each other,prudence wants to understand world's truth,but theoretical reason doesn't understand world's truth,for this reason theoretical reason possibly opposes prudence. Praxis is possibly unreasonable because man is natural entity and man lives in the world,man's opposite action and will make it true that praxis is unreasonable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Every advanced theory must find out its theoretical boundaries after making criticism,every vulgarized theory only can develop its theoretical vitality after making criticism. It is time to criticize practical category that open up a new road of understanding Marxism. According to means of Aristotle's dividing categories,we can divide all things into the entity and the attribute of entity,and so this paper reflects on praxis through four aspects:practical subject,practical object,praxis and theory,practical rationality and practical irrationality. Individual is practical subject,starting and source. Collective praxis and class praxis start from individual praxis; society,productive forces,and relations of production are not practical subject. Praxis and theory can have the same objects,between practical process,man and nature,man and world,freedom and law integrate. Prudence and practice appeal each other,prudence wants to understand world's truth,but theoretical reason doesn't understand world's truth,for this reason theoretical reason possibly opposes prudence. Praxis is possibly unreasonable because man is natural entity and man lives in the world,man's opposite action and will make it true that praxis is unreasonable.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Every advanced theory must find out its theoretical boundaries after making criticism,every vulgarized theory only can develop its theoretical vitality after making criticism. It is time to criticize practical category that open up a new road of understanding Marxism. According to means of Aristotle's dividing categories,we can divide all things into the entity and the attribute of entity,and so this paper reflects on praxis through four aspects:practical subject,practical object,praxis and theory,practical rationality and practical irrationality. Individual is practical subject,starting and source. Collective praxis and class praxis start from individual praxis; society,productive forces,and relations of production are not practical subject. Praxis and theory can have the same objects,between practical process,man and nature,man and world,freedom and law integrate. Prudence and practice appeal each other,prudence wants to understand world's truth,but theoretical reason doesn't understand world's truth,for this reason theoretical reason possibly opposes prudence. Praxis is possibly unreasonable because man is natural entity and man lives in the world,man's opposite action and will make it true that praxis is unreasonable.

Key concepts: Praxis, Epistemology, Prudence, Subject (documents), Object (grammar), Criticism, Rationality, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Critical Reflection on Praxis — Research Paper | ScholarLens