2016Journal of Clinical and Experimental DentistryOpen access

Effectiveness of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel in reducing dry socket following surgical extraction of lower third molars. A pilot study

S Requena-Calla, I Funes-Rumiche

Open full text 22 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dry socket is one of the most studied complications in dentistry and several studies have sought an effective and safe method for its prevention and treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intra-alveolar gel chlorhexidine in preventing dry socket after the surgical removal of third molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample involved the treatment of 40 patients who required extraction of third molars impacted, which were randomly assigned to research groups: experimental group (chlorhexidine gel 0.12%) and control group (placebo gel). Performed the extraction was administered 1 mL of chlorhexidine gel or 1 mL of placebo gel within the socket. The removal of suture was on the fifth postoperative day in which the presence or absence of dry socket was evaluated. RESULTS: No relationship between the appearance of dry socket after application of chlorhexidine gel or placebo gel (X2 test, p = 0.311) was found. However, significant differences (U Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.036) in the pain presented on the fifth postoperative day were evident (VAS). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel 0.12% could generate a better response to postoperative pain after the removal of third molars. KEY WORDS: Third molar surgery, dry socket, chorhexidine gel.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Dry socket is one of the most studied complications in dentistry and several studies have sought an effective and safe method for its prevention and treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intra-alveolar gel chlorhexidine in preventing dry socket after the surgical removal of third molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample involved the treatment of 40 patients who required extraction of third molars impacted, which were randomly assigned to research groups: experimental group (chlorhexidine gel 0.12%) and control group (placebo gel). Performed the extraction was administered 1 mL of chlorhexidine gel or 1 mL of placebo gel within the socket. The removal of suture was on the fifth postoperative day in which the presence or absence of dry socket was evaluated. RESULTS: No relationship between the appearance of dry socket after application of chlorhexidine gel or placebo gel (X2 test, p = 0.311) was found. However, significant differences (U Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.036) in the pain presented on the fifth postoperative day were evident (VAS). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel 0.12% could generate a better response to postoperative pain after the removal of third molars. KEY WORDS: Third molar surgery, dry socket, chorhexidine gel.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Dry socket is one of the most studied complications in dentistry and several studies have sought an effective and safe method for its prevention and treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intra-alveolar gel chlorhexidine in preventing dry socket after the surgical removal of third molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample involved the treatment of 40 patients who required extraction of third molars impacted, which were randomly assigned to research groups: experimental group (chlorhexidine gel 0.12%) and control group (placebo gel). Performed the extraction was administered 1 mL of chlorhexidine gel or 1 mL of placebo gel within the socket. The removal of suture was on the fifth postoperative day in which the presence or absence of dry socket was evaluated. RESULTS: No relationship between the appearance of dry socket after application of chlorhexidine gel or placebo gel (X2 test, p = 0.311) was found. However, significant differences (U Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.036) in the pain presented on the fifth postoperative day were evident (VAS). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel 0.12% could generate a better response to postoperative pain after the removal of third molars. KEY WORDS: Third molar surgery, dry socket, chorhexidine gel.

Key concepts: Dry socket, Chlorhexidine, Molar, Dentistry, Medicine, Placebo, Mann–Whitney U test, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effectiveness of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel in reducing dry socket following surgical extraction of lower third molars. A pilot study — Research Paper | ScholarLens