2004Journal of Zhejiang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)Requires access

The Function of Constitution in the Private Law Order

Fang Li-xin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Our daily life sees the frequent infringement of citizen's fundamental rights among private individuals. With the absence of common laws and regulations, can the judge mete out judgment in accordance with Constitution in such cases? Hereby we have the issue of application of constitution in private law sphere. The traditional constitutional theory holds that the fundamental rights are the citizen's rights against government. And constitutional rights have no effect over the disputes among private citizens. However, with the changes in economic conditions and social structure, more and more cases have appeared in which the fundamental rights are subjecting to violations among private individuals. To deal with such situations, the German Federal Constitutional Court turns the fundamental rights into an abstract objective order of values, in that way the constitutional rights are given dual characteristics. An issue arising from such a practice is a controversy between ″direct effect theory″ and ″indirect effect theory″ regarding the way the judge makes application of the constitution. However, all countries have been extremely cautious and strict in application of constitution in private law sphere. Specifically speaking, in judicial process of protecting the fundamental rights, the judge must make a clear differentiation of the relations between constitutional rights and civil rights, which mainly present themselves in the following three areas: first, the difference in the legal relations to be adjusted; second, the difference in tendencies towards the key components of rights; and third, difference in targets of rights obligations and ways of their realization. In light of the current situation in China, however, studies are still needed of the rationality of direct application of constitution in private law. From the point of comparative law, the issue was not put forward in western countries until a fair maturity of constitutional practices and theories was achieved;next, the lawful order in the West depends on the formations and maturity of a civil society; furthermore, it is not conform to the intrinsic requirement of China's current political system. Finally, technical problems remain in the judge's direct application of constitution in private law area. Under such circumstances, it is advisable to render fundamental rights functional in private law relation by way of constitutional interpretation and realize indirect application through value infiltration. Meanwhile, the general clauses in private law can be seen as a cut-in point for fundamental rights. Judges are also required to give full display to judicial initiatives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Our daily life sees the frequent infringement of citizen's fundamental rights among private individuals. With the absence of common laws and regulations, can the judge mete out judgment in accordance with Constitution in such cases? Hereby we have the issue of application of constitution in private law sphere. The traditional constitutional theory holds that the fundamental rights are the citizen's rights against government. And constitutional rights have no effect over the disputes among private citizens. However, with the changes in economic conditions and social structure, more and more cases have appeared in which the fundamental rights are subjecting to violations among private individuals. To deal with such situations, the German Federal Constitutional Court turns the fundamental rights into an abstract objective order of values, in that way the constitutional rights are given dual characteristics. An issue arising from such a practice is a controversy between ″direct effect theory″ and ″indirect effect theory″ regarding the way the judge makes application of the constitution. However, all countries have been extremely cautious and strict in application of constitution in private law sphere. Specifically speaking, in judicial process of protecting the fundamental rights, the judge must make a clear differentiation of the relations between constitutional rights and civil rights, which mainly present themselves in the following three areas: first, the difference in the legal relations to be adjusted; second, the difference in tendencies towards the key components of rights; and third, difference in targets of rights obligations and ways of their realization. In light of the current situation in China, however, studies are still needed of the rationality of direct application of constitution in private law. From the point of comparative law, the issue was not put forward in western countries until a fair maturity of constitutional practices and theories was achieved;next, the lawful order in the West depends on the formations and maturity of a civil society; furthermore, it is not conform to the intrinsic requirement of China's current political system. Finally, technical problems remain in the judge's direct application of constitution in private law area. Under such circumstances, it is advisable to render fundamental rights functional in private law relation by way of constitutional interpretation and realize indirect application through value infiltration. Meanwhile, the general clauses in private law can be seen as a cut-in point for fundamental rights. Judges are also required to give full display to judicial initiatives.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Our daily life sees the frequent infringement of citizen's fundamental rights among private individuals. With the absence of common laws and regulations, can the judge mete out judgment in accordance with Constitution in such cases? Hereby we have the issue of application of constitution in private law sphere. The traditional constitutional theory holds that the fundamental rights are the citizen's rights against government. And constitutional rights have no effect over the disputes among private citizens. However, with the changes in economic conditions and social structure, more and more cases have appeared in which the fundamental rights are subjecting to violations among private individuals. To deal with such situations, the German Federal Constitutional Court turns the fundamental rights into an abstract objective order of values, in that way the constitutional rights are given dual characteristics. An issue arising from such a practice is a controversy between ″direct effect theory″ and ″indirect effect theory″ regarding the way the judge makes application of the constitution. However, all countries have been extremely cautious and strict in application of constitution in private law sphere. Specifically speaking, in judicial process of protecting the fundamental rights, the judge must make a clear differentiation of the relations between constitutional rights and civil rights, which mainly present themselves in the following three areas: first, the difference in the legal relations to be adjusted; second, the difference in tendencies towards the key components of rights; and third, difference in targets of rights obligations and ways of their realization. In light of the current situation in China, however, studies are still needed of the rationality of direct application of constitution in private law. From the point of comparative law, the issue was not put forward in western countries until a fair maturity of constitutional practices and theories was achieved;next, the lawful order in the West depends on the formations and maturity of a civil society; furthermore, it is not conform to the intrinsic requirement of China's current political system. Finally, technical problems remain in the judge's direct application of constitution in private law area. Under such circumstances, it is advisable to render fundamental rights functional in private law relation by way of constitutional interpretation and realize indirect application through value infiltration. Meanwhile, the general clauses in private law can be seen as a cut-in point for fundamental rights. Judges are also required to give full display to judicial initiatives.

Key concepts: Fundamental rights, Constitution, Law, Political science, Private rights, Constitutional theory, Constitutional law, Reservation of rights

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Function of Constitution in the Private Law Order — Research Paper | ScholarLens