Study on bioequivalent evaluation of Lifu Jiaonang in healthy volunteers
Lidong Deng
Abstract
Lidong Deng
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of Lifu Jiaonang were studied. METHOD Isoniazid and rifampicin were determined after a single oral dose of testing preparation Lifu Jiaonang and standard preparation Rifinah were given respectively to 24 volunteers in an open randomized cross-over test. Isoniazid and rifampicin concentration in plasma were assayed by RP-HPLC method.RESULTS The AUC 0→∞ of rifampicin of the two formations were (62.28± 18.22)μg·h·mL -1 and (59.53±18.75)μg·h·mL -1 ; T max were (2.02±0.38)h and (2.02±0.35)h;C max were (13.20±2.77)μg·mL -1 and (13.23±3.55)μg·mL -1 respectively. The AUC 0→∞ of isoniazid of the two formations were (12.73±4.53)μg·h·mL -1 and (15.85±4.97)μg·h·mL -1 ; T max were (1.71±0.25)h and (1.85±0.35)h;C max were (4.39±1.47)μg·mL -1 and (5.36±1.55)μg·mL -1 respectively. The result of statistical analysis showed that there were no significant difference of the AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of isoniazid and rifampicin between the two formations(P0.05). CONCLUSION Lifu Jiaonang tablet and Rifinah tablets were bioequivalent using AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of isoniazid and rifampicin as evaluated factors, the bioequivalence of rifampicin and isoniazid of Lifu Jiaonang were (105.85±11.67)% and (102.81±15.42)% using Rifinah tablet as standard preparation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of Lifu Jiaonang were studied. METHOD Isoniazid and rifampicin were determined after a single oral dose of testing preparation Lifu Jiaonang and standard preparation Rifinah were given respectively to 24 volunteers in an open randomized cross-over test. Isoniazid and rifampicin concentration in plasma were assayed by RP-HPLC method.RESULTS The AUC 0→∞ of rifampicin of the two formations were (62.28± 18.22)μg·h·mL -1 and (59.53±18.75)μg·h·mL -1 ; T max were (2.02±0.38)h and (2.02±0.35)h;C max were (13.20±2.77)μg·mL -1 and (13.23±3.55)μg·mL -1 respectively. The AUC 0→∞ of isoniazid of the two formations were (12.73±4.53)μg·h·mL -1 and (15.85±4.97)μg·h·mL -1 ; T max were (1.71±0.25)h and (1.85±0.35)h;C max were (4.39±1.47)μg·mL -1 and (5.36±1.55)μg·mL -1 respectively. The result of statistical analysis showed that there were no significant difference of the AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of isoniazid and rifampicin between the two formations(P0.05). CONCLUSION Lifu Jiaonang tablet and Rifinah tablets were bioequivalent using AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of isoniazid and rifampicin as evaluated factors, the bioequivalence of rifampicin and isoniazid of Lifu Jiaonang were (105.85±11.67)% and (102.81±15.42)% using Rifinah tablet as standard preparation.
Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Rifampicin, Isoniazid, Medicine, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Tuberculosis