2004The Chinese Journal of Modern Applied PharmacyRequires access

Study on bioequivalent evaluation of Lifu Jiaonang in healthy volunteers

Lidong Deng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of Lifu Jiaonang were studied. METHOD Isoniazid and rifampicin were determined after a single oral dose of testing preparation Lifu Jiaonang and standard preparation Rifinah were given respectively to 24 volunteers in an open randomized cross-over test. Isoniazid and rifampicin concentration in plasma were assayed by RP-HPLC method.RESULTS The AUC 0→∞ of rifampicin of the two formations were (62.28± 18.22)μg·h·mL -1 and (59.53±18.75)μg·h·mL -1 ; T max were (2.02±0.38)h and (2.02±0.35)h;C max were (13.20±2.77)μg·mL -1 and (13.23±3.55)μg·mL -1 respectively. The AUC 0→∞ of isoniazid of the two formations were (12.73±4.53)μg·h·mL -1 and (15.85±4.97)μg·h·mL -1 ; T max were (1.71±0.25)h and (1.85±0.35)h;C max were (4.39±1.47)μg·mL -1 and (5.36±1.55)μg·mL -1 respectively. The result of statistical analysis showed that there were no significant difference of the AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of isoniazid and rifampicin between the two formations(P0.05). CONCLUSION Lifu Jiaonang tablet and Rifinah tablets were bioequivalent using AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of isoniazid and rifampicin as evaluated factors, the bioequivalence of rifampicin and isoniazid of Lifu Jiaonang were (105.85±11.67)% and (102.81±15.42)% using Rifinah tablet as standard preparation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of Lifu Jiaonang were studied. METHOD Isoniazid and rifampicin were determined after a single oral dose of testing preparation Lifu Jiaonang and standard preparation Rifinah were given respectively to 24 volunteers in an open randomized cross-over test. Isoniazid and rifampicin concentration in plasma were assayed by RP-HPLC method.RESULTS The AUC 0→∞ of rifampicin of the two formations were (62.28± 18.22)μg·h·mL -1 and (59.53±18.75)μg·h·mL -1 ; T max were (2.02±0.38)h and (2.02±0.35)h;C max were (13.20±2.77)μg·mL -1 and (13.23±3.55)μg·mL -1 respectively. The AUC 0→∞ of isoniazid of the two formations were (12.73±4.53)μg·h·mL -1 and (15.85±4.97)μg·h·mL -1 ; T max were (1.71±0.25)h and (1.85±0.35)h;C max were (4.39±1.47)μg·mL -1 and (5.36±1.55)μg·mL -1 respectively. The result of statistical analysis showed that there were no significant difference of the AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of isoniazid and rifampicin between the two formations(P0.05). CONCLUSION Lifu Jiaonang tablet and Rifinah tablets were bioequivalent using AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of isoniazid and rifampicin as evaluated factors, the bioequivalence of rifampicin and isoniazid of Lifu Jiaonang were (105.85±11.67)% and (102.81±15.42)% using Rifinah tablet as standard preparation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of Lifu Jiaonang were studied. METHOD Isoniazid and rifampicin were determined after a single oral dose of testing preparation Lifu Jiaonang and standard preparation Rifinah were given respectively to 24 volunteers in an open randomized cross-over test. Isoniazid and rifampicin concentration in plasma were assayed by RP-HPLC method.RESULTS The AUC 0→∞ of rifampicin of the two formations were (62.28± 18.22)μg·h·mL -1 and (59.53±18.75)μg·h·mL -1 ; T max were (2.02±0.38)h and (2.02±0.35)h;C max were (13.20±2.77)μg·mL -1 and (13.23±3.55)μg·mL -1 respectively. The AUC 0→∞ of isoniazid of the two formations were (12.73±4.53)μg·h·mL -1 and (15.85±4.97)μg·h·mL -1 ; T max were (1.71±0.25)h and (1.85±0.35)h;C max were (4.39±1.47)μg·mL -1 and (5.36±1.55)μg·mL -1 respectively. The result of statistical analysis showed that there were no significant difference of the AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of isoniazid and rifampicin between the two formations(P0.05). CONCLUSION Lifu Jiaonang tablet and Rifinah tablets were bioequivalent using AUC 0→∞ 、T max and C max of isoniazid and rifampicin as evaluated factors, the bioequivalence of rifampicin and isoniazid of Lifu Jiaonang were (105.85±11.67)% and (102.81±15.42)% using Rifinah tablet as standard preparation.

Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Rifampicin, Isoniazid, Medicine, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Tuberculosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study on bioequivalent evaluation of Lifu Jiaonang in healthy volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens