2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of PET-CT versus mammography and ultrasonography in detecting breast neoplasms

Yuan Jian-we

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG) PET-CT imaging in detecting breast cancer. Methods 60 patients with suspicious masses underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging, mammography and ultrasonography respectively. The results of the histopathology after surgery were used as diagnostic golden standard. The uptaking of 18F-FDG in the breast masses was analyzed using semiquantitative and qualitative methods. The findings of PET-CT,mammography and ultrasonography in detecting breast cancer were compared. Results 48 malignant and 12 benign breast lesions of the 60 patients were proven histologically after surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value obtained by PET-CT were 93.8%,83.3%,91.7% and 95.7%, respectively, and which were 81.3%,83.3%,81.7%,95.1% and 85.4%,83.3%,85.0%,95.3% with mammography and ultrasonographic. In the diagnostic ability among the three methods there was no significant difference showed(χ2=3.40,P0.5 ).Conclusions PET-CT has higher degree of sensitivity, specificily and higher positive predictive value in breast cancer diagnosis and staging comparing to the mammography and ultrasonographic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the clinical value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG) PET-CT imaging in detecting breast cancer. Methods 60 patients with suspicious masses underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging, mammography and ultrasonography respectively. The results of the histopathology after surgery were used as diagnostic golden standard. The uptaking of 18F-FDG in the breast masses was analyzed using semiquantitative and qualitative methods. The findings of PET-CT,mammography and ultrasonography in detecting breast cancer were compared. Results 48 malignant and 12 benign breast lesions of the 60 patients were proven histologically after surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value obtained by PET-CT were 93.8%,83.3%,91.7% and 95.7%, respectively, and which were 81.3%,83.3%,81.7%,95.1% and 85.4%,83.3%,85.0%,95.3% with mammography and ultrasonographic. In the diagnostic ability among the three methods there was no significant difference showed(χ2=3.40,P0.5 ).Conclusions PET-CT has higher degree of sensitivity, specificily and higher positive predictive value in breast cancer diagnosis and staging comparing to the mammography and ultrasonographic.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG) PET-CT imaging in detecting breast cancer. Methods 60 patients with suspicious masses underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging, mammography and ultrasonography respectively. The results of the histopathology after surgery were used as diagnostic golden standard. The uptaking of 18F-FDG in the breast masses was analyzed using semiquantitative and qualitative methods. The findings of PET-CT,mammography and ultrasonography in detecting breast cancer were compared. Results 48 malignant and 12 benign breast lesions of the 60 patients were proven histologically after surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value obtained by PET-CT were 93.8%,83.3%,91.7% and 95.7%, respectively, and which were 81.3%,83.3%,81.7%,95.1% and 85.4%,83.3%,85.0%,95.3% with mammography and ultrasonographic. In the diagnostic ability among the three methods there was no significant difference showed(χ2=3.40,P0.5 ).Conclusions PET-CT has higher degree of sensitivity, specificily and higher positive predictive value in breast cancer diagnosis and staging comparing to the mammography and ultrasonographic.

Key concepts: Medicine, Mammography, Breast cancer, Radiology, Ultrasonography, Histopathology, Predictive value, Gold standard (test)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of PET-CT versus mammography and ultrasonography in detecting breast neoplasms — Research Paper | ScholarLens