Government Contract Institution in China
Yun Chen
Abstract
Yun Chen
Abstract
In market economy, government contract, as a means of administration, is expected to mediate and conciliate the interests between the public and private and to restrain the ever-expanding administrative power. It is proposed that the power of respective administrative organs to enter into government contract must be clearly defined and the execution of administrative priority must satisfy strict stipulations. In resolving government contract dispute, administrative review, administrative verdict and administrative litigation should be first choices. And the ordinary market individuals who have sustained damage are entitled to state compensation in the execution of government contract.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In market economy, government contract, as a means of administration, is expected to mediate and conciliate the interests between the public and private and to restrain the ever-expanding administrative power. It is proposed that the power of respective administrative organs to enter into government contract must be clearly defined and the execution of administrative priority must satisfy strict stipulations. In resolving government contract dispute, administrative review, administrative verdict and administrative litigation should be first choices. And the ordinary market individuals who have sustained damage are entitled to state compensation in the execution of government contract.
Key concepts: Government (linguistics), Business, Institution, Administration (probate law), State (computer science), Contract management, China, Compensation (psychology)