2016Military Medical Journal of Southeast ChinaRequires access

Clinical comparison of limited blood transfusion and open blood transfusion during operation

Han Hong-zhe

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of intraoperative restrictive transfusion and open blood transfusion.Methods A retrospective analysis of 104 patients with large and medium-sized blood transfusion in the hospital from July 2014 to May2015 was performed. From July 2014 to December 2014,51 patients were selected as control group and the open blood transfusion was carried out. From January 2015 to May 2015,53 patients were selected as the observation group,and limited blood transfusion was carried out. The blood transfusion and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 3.77%. The total blood transfusion and per blood transfusion volume were 1014.63 U and( 2.09 ±1.05) U respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions in the control group was 15.69%. The total blood transfusion and per blood transfusion volume was 1534.43 U and( 3.14±1.47) U respectively. Conclusion Compared with open blood transfusion,restrictive blood transfusion can not only save blood resource,but also reduce the incidence of adverse reactions,which is worthy of promotion in clinical use.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of intraoperative restrictive transfusion and open blood transfusion.Methods A retrospective analysis of 104 patients with large and medium-sized blood transfusion in the hospital from July 2014 to May2015 was performed. From July 2014 to December 2014,51 patients were selected as control group and the open blood transfusion was carried out. From January 2015 to May 2015,53 patients were selected as the observation group,and limited blood transfusion was carried out. The blood transfusion and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 3.77%. The total blood transfusion and per blood transfusion volume were 1014.63 U and( 2.09 ±1.05) U respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions in the control group was 15.69%. The total blood transfusion and per blood transfusion volume was 1534.43 U and( 3.14±1.47) U respectively. Conclusion Compared with open blood transfusion,restrictive blood transfusion can not only save blood resource,but also reduce the incidence of adverse reactions,which is worthy of promotion in clinical use.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of intraoperative restrictive transfusion and open blood transfusion.Methods A retrospective analysis of 104 patients with large and medium-sized blood transfusion in the hospital from July 2014 to May2015 was performed. From July 2014 to December 2014,51 patients were selected as control group and the open blood transfusion was carried out. From January 2015 to May 2015,53 patients were selected as the observation group,and limited blood transfusion was carried out. The blood transfusion and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 3.77%. The total blood transfusion and per blood transfusion volume were 1014.63 U and( 2.09 ±1.05) U respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions in the control group was 15.69%. The total blood transfusion and per blood transfusion volume was 1534.43 U and( 3.14±1.47) U respectively. Conclusion Compared with open blood transfusion,restrictive blood transfusion can not only save blood resource,but also reduce the incidence of adverse reactions,which is worthy of promotion in clinical use.

Key concepts: Medicine, Blood transfusion, Incidence (geometry), Adverse effect, Anesthesia, Surgery, Transfusion reaction, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical comparison of limited blood transfusion and open blood transfusion during operation — Research Paper | ScholarLens