2009•Nanjing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue xuebaoRequires access

On Connotation and Extension of the Imputation Principles in Tort

Liu Qing-sheng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

People are different in understanding what the imputation principle is,and we should cognize the imputation principles by casting back their phylogeny,and then we can find that the imputation principle is just a reason that legislator makes the party respond.The liability for no is not an imputation principle but consists of many imputation principles,in which the liability for abnormal jeopardy is an important one.Now there are two imputation principles in private law: the liability for fault and the liability for abnormal jeopardy,which should be applied to tort at the same time.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

People are different in understanding what the imputation principle is,and we should cognize the imputation principles by casting back their phylogeny,and then we can find that the imputation principle is just a reason that legislator makes the party respond.The liability for no is not an imputation principle but consists of many imputation principles,in which the liability for abnormal jeopardy is an important one.Now there are two imputation principles in private law: the liability for fault and the liability for abnormal jeopardy,which should be applied to tort at the same time.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

People are different in understanding what the imputation principle is,and we should cognize the imputation principles by casting back their phylogeny,and then we can find that the imputation principle is just a reason that legislator makes the party respond.The liability for no is not an imputation principle but consists of many imputation principles,in which the liability for abnormal jeopardy is an important one.Now there are two imputation principles in private law: the liability for fault and the liability for abnormal jeopardy,which should be applied to tort at the same time.

Key concepts: Imputation (statistics), Liability, Tort, Legislator, Computer science, Law, Missing data, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Connotation and Extension of the Imputation Principles in Tort — Research Paper | ScholarLens