Effect of Row Spacing Pattern on Yield and Plant Height Uniformity in Highly-densed Summer Maize
Zhang Quanguo
Abstract
Zhang Quanguo
Abstract
In comparison with treatments of row spacing of 40 cm,50 cm,60 cm,70 cm and 40 + 80 cm,the treatment of row spacing of 50 cm ranked first with increase of 5.15%-5.77% in yield,and 40 cm was followed under about 70 000 plant/ha planting condition.There was no significant difference among row spacing of 40 cm,40 + 80 cm,60 cm and 70 cm.The optimum planting pattern was 50 cm row spacing with ratio of row space to plant space of 1.82 ∶ 1 for highly-densed summer maize.There was a trend of increase in grain number per hectare,grain weight and plant height uniformity with row spacing reduced,which compensated to some extent the negative effect on grain number per ear and 1 000-grain weight.There was no significant difference for layer and number of secondary roots among treatments.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In comparison with treatments of row spacing of 40 cm,50 cm,60 cm,70 cm and 40 + 80 cm,the treatment of row spacing of 50 cm ranked first with increase of 5.15%-5.77% in yield,and 40 cm was followed under about 70 000 plant/ha planting condition.There was no significant difference among row spacing of 40 cm,40 + 80 cm,60 cm and 70 cm.The optimum planting pattern was 50 cm row spacing with ratio of row space to plant space of 1.82 ∶ 1 for highly-densed summer maize.There was a trend of increase in grain number per hectare,grain weight and plant height uniformity with row spacing reduced,which compensated to some extent the negative effect on grain number per ear and 1 000-grain weight.There was no significant difference for layer and number of secondary roots among treatments.
Key concepts: Sowing, Hectare, Mathematics, Grain yield, Yield (engineering), Agronomy, Significant difference, Biology