2004Legal ForumRequires access

From the "No Reason" Decision to Judgment "Argumentation" --Analysis of Justness of Judgment Argumentation

Lin Xi-fe

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Because of the influence of the Civil Law tradition, the reasoning of judgment has not been institutionalized, and even been limited in the discussion whether it needs to be. Through analysis, we realize that there is an inherent requirementfor the institutionalization of it in the recent Chinese judicial context. For the first, the reasoning of the judgment is the result of the open for judge's power, and also is the judge's strategy for self-protection; for the second, it is the inherent demand of the modernization of judicial function, if can make the civilian admit the decision in the deep heart. After that, through analyzing by comparison, we try to ascertain the fundamental problems such as the subject, object of the reasoning, and so on.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Because of the influence of the Civil Law tradition, the reasoning of judgment has not been institutionalized, and even been limited in the discussion whether it needs to be. Through analysis, we realize that there is an inherent requirementfor the institutionalization of it in the recent Chinese judicial context. For the first, the reasoning of the judgment is the result of the open for judge's power, and also is the judge's strategy for self-protection; for the second, it is the inherent demand of the modernization of judicial function, if can make the civilian admit the decision in the deep heart. After that, through analyzing by comparison, we try to ascertain the fundamental problems such as the subject, object of the reasoning, and so on.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Because of the influence of the Civil Law tradition, the reasoning of judgment has not been institutionalized, and even been limited in the discussion whether it needs to be. Through analysis, we realize that there is an inherent requirementfor the institutionalization of it in the recent Chinese judicial context. For the first, the reasoning of the judgment is the result of the open for judge's power, and also is the judge's strategy for self-protection; for the second, it is the inherent demand of the modernization of judicial function, if can make the civilian admit the decision in the deep heart. After that, through analyzing by comparison, we try to ascertain the fundamental problems such as the subject, object of the reasoning, and so on.

Key concepts: Argumentation theory, Context (archaeology), Institutionalisation, Judicial opinion, Object (grammar), Subject (documents), Power (physics), Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From the "No Reason" Decision to Judgment "Argumentation" --Analysis of Justness of Judgment Argumentation — Research Paper | ScholarLens