On the Syntax of English Restrictive Relative Clauses
Hou Min-ji
Abstract
Hou Min-ji
Abstract
English finite restrictive relative clauses come in three different forms.It is argued that on a unified account all the three can be analyzed as CPs headed by that or a covert complementizer to provide the declarative force of the clause.Contrary to common belief,that at the beginning of the relative clause is not a relative pronoun but a simple complementizer.Constrained by the Complemmentizer Condition,a relative CP can contain only either an overt wh-relative or an overt complementizer,even though the two occupy different structural positions.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
English finite restrictive relative clauses come in three different forms.It is argued that on a unified account all the three can be analyzed as CPs headed by that or a covert complementizer to provide the declarative force of the clause.Contrary to common belief,that at the beginning of the relative clause is not a relative pronoun but a simple complementizer.Constrained by the Complemmentizer Condition,a relative CP can contain only either an overt wh-relative or an overt complementizer,even though the two occupy different structural positions.
Key concepts: Complementizer, Relative clause, Covert, Linguistics, Dependent clause, Syntax, Computer science, Philosophy