2010Chinese Journal of Medical UltrasoundRequires access

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in evaluating abdominal aneurysm and comparison by CT angiography

Luyao Zhou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the capability of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and CT angiography(CTA)in evaluating abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods Both CEUS and CTA examinations were performed in 18 patients (diagnosis before surgery in 10 patients, surveillance after surgery in 8 patients). The CEUS contrast agent was Sonovue. The diagnosis and the appearance about abdominal aortic aneurysm, dissecting aortic aneurysm, aortic pseudoaneurysm and the image after operation were compared. Results There were abdominal aortic aneurysm in 5 patients, dissecting aortic aneurysm in 4 patients and aortic pseudoaneurysm without operation in 1 patient. The 8 patients under surveillance after operation including endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in 4 patients and open repair with artificial vascular in 4 patients. Both CEUS and CTA had the same results. Conclusion The CEUS is comparable to CTA in diagnosing abdominal aortic aneurysm. The CEUS is worthy of application in abdominal aortic aneurysm.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the capability of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and CT angiography(CTA)in evaluating abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods Both CEUS and CTA examinations were performed in 18 patients (diagnosis before surgery in 10 patients, surveillance after surgery in 8 patients). The CEUS contrast agent was Sonovue. The diagnosis and the appearance about abdominal aortic aneurysm, dissecting aortic aneurysm, aortic pseudoaneurysm and the image after operation were compared. Results There were abdominal aortic aneurysm in 5 patients, dissecting aortic aneurysm in 4 patients and aortic pseudoaneurysm without operation in 1 patient. The 8 patients under surveillance after operation including endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in 4 patients and open repair with artificial vascular in 4 patients. Both CEUS and CTA had the same results. Conclusion The CEUS is comparable to CTA in diagnosing abdominal aortic aneurysm. The CEUS is worthy of application in abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the capability of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and CT angiography(CTA)in evaluating abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods Both CEUS and CTA examinations were performed in 18 patients (diagnosis before surgery in 10 patients, surveillance after surgery in 8 patients). The CEUS contrast agent was Sonovue. The diagnosis and the appearance about abdominal aortic aneurysm, dissecting aortic aneurysm, aortic pseudoaneurysm and the image after operation were compared. Results There were abdominal aortic aneurysm in 5 patients, dissecting aortic aneurysm in 4 patients and aortic pseudoaneurysm without operation in 1 patient. The 8 patients under surveillance after operation including endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in 4 patients and open repair with artificial vascular in 4 patients. Both CEUS and CTA had the same results. Conclusion The CEUS is comparable to CTA in diagnosing abdominal aortic aneurysm. The CEUS is worthy of application in abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Key concepts: Medicine, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Radiology, Aneurysm, Angiography, Pseudoaneurysm, Aortic aneurysm, Ultrasonography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in evaluating abdominal aneurysm and comparison by CT angiography — Research Paper | ScholarLens